I hadn't thought of that, but that could be the case.
2007-11-01 08:33:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by kmcpmgoodson 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
i'm no longer non secular, yet I do have heavy sociological / anthropological historic past. in case you sense the would desire to "worry" your God, then it extremely is on account which you sense responsible for some thing, or you % to sense victimized. maximum persons do no longer worry their God. They love their God. God is somewhat like the only impressive chief. As Machiavelli reported, a solid chief would desire to be the two enjoyed and feared. If he's only enjoyed, then human beings will nonetheless do what they % against his desires at circumstances. If he's only feared, then they won't love their very very own lives, in common terms doing what he needs out of worry of ramifications. in the event that they love and worry him, then they're going to do what he needs out of affection and appreciate first, and out of worry 2nd. enable me attempt to apply a distinctive analogy for God... God, in maximum peoples' eyes, is almost a solid make sure. a solid make sure makes use of two aspects love and a million area self-discipline to make sure human beings lead a solid existence. a million area love is unconditional. God loves you unconditionally, on account which you're his creation. (only as a make sure loves their newborn unconditionally). a million area love is for constructive reinforcement. God shows you like to reward your solid habit. it extremely is what maximum persons call "reward", "miracles", and so on. mum and dad do a similar with them infants; provide them hugs whilst they be triumphant. a million area self-discipline is used for unfavourable reinforcement. God punishes human beings whilst they have been undesirable. mum and dad do a similar to infants. Now, maximum persons will persist with a Godly existence because of the fact they appreciate and love God by using a million area unconditional love, and a million area constructive reinforcement. If that would not artwork then they worry the a million area self-discipline. regardless of if, what's "blessing" and "punishment" from God is subjective. distinctive religions, or maybe persons, may even see some thing as a blessing whilst others see it as a curse. all of us can see regardless of they % into some thing. whilst a mom hugs a newborn, it extremely is exceptionally tangible that it extremely is a hug. yet, whilst a man or woman shows $5 on the line is that a blessing? What if it only facilitates them to do some thing undesirable? i think of the extra beneficial thank you to look at God is that he supplies human beings possibilities. The $5 is an possibility. How the guy chooses to apply that possibility dictates no remember if it extremely is a "blessing" or "curse".
2016-09-28 03:40:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a very good point. Yes, it happens, on both sides of the debate. I think it's rooted in the innate human need to be "right", to be "better" than someone else.
2007-11-01 10:00:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by anna 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yep.
Christians go out of their way to point to Joseph Smiths life, as an example of why the book of Mormon cannot be inspired.
Yet if they looked into the lives of the men who canonized the bible they would find much the same things, but with more murder.
2007-11-01 08:34:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Natuarally.
Religion has always been able to justify their actions if it makes more people come to the "One True Path" which just happens to be theirs.
2007-11-01 08:32:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah, it's called building a client base. It's even better when that includes shrinking your opposition's client base.
2007-11-01 08:32:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brent 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
You hit the crucifixation right on the head.
2007-11-01 08:35:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Have you noticed how they put each other down on R&S? They most definitely do this.
2007-11-01 08:40:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shawn B 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Of course. But in business, if someone besmirches your business out of spite, you can sue for slander and/or libel.
2007-11-01 08:32:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cheryl E 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
No, its the same with churches. Because they ARE (nontaxable) businesses.
2007-11-01 08:32:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by I, Sapient 7
·
1⤊
2⤋