russian is a nice in military yes or no
2007-11-01 05:54:33 · 12 answers · asked by elyes mehri 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I think the russians did a great job with what they had on hand. They made great sacrifices to win the war on the Eastern front. They fought hard.
g-day!
2007-11-04 13:24:58 · answer #1 · answered by Kekionga 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont really understand the question but the russian army aquitted itself with great courage during the second world war. The officer corps was decimated by stalin and it took some time to recover an effective leadership. Often objectives were gained by shear overwhelming numbers rather than cunning and prowess. But latterly leadership issues were ironed out and the likes of general zukov came to the fore making them a much more coordinated and effective fighting force. Tanks such as the T34 and planes like the Sturmovik Yak played there part in forging a military juggernaut that the third reich had no hope of stopping.
so I'm guessing the answer is yes lol
2007-11-03 02:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by mickstocks2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in all possibility as a results of fact Western eu worldwide places are not working the international anymore. There hasn't been a international conflict as a results of fact the great eu powers collapsed. For the longest time all Europe did became start up wars and take great factor approximately much less greater human beings. each and every little thing human beings accuse u . s . of doing. humorous how we ignore approximately background.
2016-11-09 22:56:17 · answer #3 · answered by hohl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
???
That makes no sense.
If you are asking if the Russian army in WWII was especially effective...no. Stalin had 50,000 men in his Officer corps executed, simply because he didn't like people who knew more about things he claimed knowledge of. For the most part, the Russian army was effective because the soldiers feared the vicious tempers of the Political Officers and their need for Soviet blood, and because they sacrificed massive numbers for the simplest of goals. Especially when you consider that for every two soldiers, one was given a rifle, and one was given ammunition.
2007-11-01 06:09:58 · answer #4 · answered by jcurrieii 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? try again.. anyway the Russian soldier has historically been under paid, under educated corrupt and usually they are
extremely brutal.
2007-11-01 06:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I`m really glad I`ve read this whilst sober. If I`d read this after a few happy pints I`d be totally fecked.
I`m still fecked though.
2007-11-01 07:41:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yikes! What are you trying to say?
2007-11-01 05:58:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
plese explain your question with more detail, Ja?
2007-11-02 14:10:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
da
2007-11-01 08:20:48 · answer #9 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
is your name borat?
2007-11-01 08:24:41 · answer #10 · answered by <><><> 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋