What do you think of future predictions?

Question

2006-JAN-25: James Kingsley predicted a major "Earthquake Storm" near Los Angeles, CA.
It would be centered in Redondo Beach. The individual quakes range in magnitude from 7.1 to 7.9

2006-MAY-25: Eric Julien of the Exopolitics Institute predicted that a remnant from a comet would hit the Atlantic ocean and generate massive tsunami almost 200 meters in height.

SEP-08/09: The Lord's Witness and the True Bible Code predicted that a nuclear bomb will hit the UN plaza in Manhattan on the Sabbath, sometime between sundown on SEP-08 and sundown on SEP-09. This is the same group who predicted that the UN would take over the world sometime between 2001-MAR-26 and APR-24 and that a word-wide famine would being during 2001-SEP.

SEP-12: The House of Yahweh issued a news release stating that nuclear war was to begin on SEP-12. Their leader, Yisrayl Hawkins, says that the countdown to the nuclear war began with the signing of the Oslo accords on 1993-SEP-13.

None of these never happened

Answer 1

Predictions? no such thing!

Answer 2

i think the boldness with which the conclusions are provided would have some effect on which word you opt for. The IPCC is amazingly careful to outline the possibilities at the back of the words they use of their projections (words human beings frequently use without regard to their genuinely impression like 'in all possibility' or 'specific'.) They assign self assurance tiers to the conclusions they get from their variety outputs. they do no longer cover that there are issues they're doubtful approximately. in addition they place emphasis on the issues they're plenty greater effective approximately, based on the quantity of study, point of scientific understanding, high quality of fashions etc. etc. which you will say something is a prediction, in my e book (a hearty disclaimer), implies a intense point of certainty. self assurance tiers (as an example 95% certainty) are arbitrary as this is, and each point of transforming into those predictions has their very own uncertainty linked with it. If a researcher makes an 'if X then Y' hypothesis yet has low certainty as to what degree X will ensue, this is confusing to declare that Y may even ensue with the mixed errors of those 2 predictions. via making an ensemble of projections, the study comments a chain of those X hypotheses and Y outcomes, and that they'd say with intense self assurance that certainly one of those Y events will ensue, they only won't be in a position to declare which one as a results of predicting the occurrence of X. What i'm attempting to declare is this. If the certainty is intense sufficient, this is a prediction. in line with what you realize, you could gamble that it will take place. If there is uncertainty at diverse tiers, you're making a projection over a variety events that should ensue. this way there is preparation for those outcomes to mitigate what ability "undesirable issues" will take place.

Answer 3

The problem with predictions that hundreds of people with no standing other than in there own eyes make stupid predictions that do not come true, thus masking that some are made that do actually come true.

The predictions of Daniel regarding the coming of Christ became true, as will the predictions of Christ about the End Times. The signs of that are already with us, at least 7 of them so far.

Answer 4

They, like all predictions are fake.

All those that claim psychic abilities are lying or are mislead themselves. If any person can prove that they really have ANY abilities, there is a $1,000,000 prize waiting for them. No one can do it. The famous "psychics" (John Edwards, Sylvia Browne, etc.) all claim that they don't need the money so they won't prove it (Sylvia Browne actually agreed to prove it while on Larry King Live, but has never actually shown any proof). But if they really had powers, why would they not just prove it, take the money and give it to charity.

www.randi.org has the info on the cash.

Answer 5

Crackpots will be crackpots.

But then again, one rule of biblical prophecy is that prophecies of destruction can be averted thru sincere repentence....a la Jonah and Nineveh. So that these predictions didn't come to pass means nothing.

If someone can accurately predict when the Cubbies will win the world series, in how many games and the final scores....then we will know the end is near.

Answer 6

none of these predictors would do an on-the-spot prediction of something that would happen in the near future and that is verifiable. So until they are ready to commit to predictions that can be evaluated whose accuracy can be determined, the house of yahweh, the lord's witness and the others should shut their pie holes.

Answer 7

The future is what you and I make of it. Any future outcome can be change through hard work, and a better plan or course of action. God would consider predicting the future, as a moral negative, because he wants us to contribute positively to this world, and making its future brighter. One can give warnings of what might happen, if we don't change our course, this would be of helpful and God would like this.

Answer 8

I got a fortune cookie two years ago that said I would soon come into money .... I'm still waiting.

Answer 9

I think that the bible says that we should steer clear of people that try to predict the future....... :-)

Answer 10

Prophecy yeah prediction no!