You would think that the dream act that dingy harry and the gang want would piss off people in college. It give the illegals IN STATE rates for school.
So if you do not live in state and go to school you will be considered a second class citizen.
As for the illegals in this country everyone talks about the cost to deport them, what cost??? They walked in they can walk out. Build a double fence facing Mexico, put a sprinkler in the middles for some water, (they took bigger chances to come here) and send them home. Remove the border baby status from the one born here and send them packing.
Here is a link to what would happen to America if they left.
http://newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty306.htm
It is not a bad thing. But all the bleeding heart liberals could care less that Americans ate taxed to the max.
2007-10-31 23:42:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
This generation has the power with modern computers, networks and biometrics to simply and effectively solve an immigration problem that has plagued the US for a hundred years. There will be unfortunate impacts on some people and minor, transit regional economic issues; however, the issue at stake is that if immigration is not conducted in a controlled, deliberate fashion, the US will become as a third world country for future generations. This result is due to the population numbers and is not related to any race or nationality. Current population projections clearly show this.
The 1986 immigration reform was good legislation and provides the tools necessary to control immigration. The application of modern technologies such as biometrics and biometric data bases will make enforcement simple and highly cost effective. The addition of a simple chip that is present on most credit cards will contain the basic biometric data to compare against bio data and card data to a central data base. This system is in daily use all over the country. I use it daily to log onto my computer at work. It's no biggie. Insert card, put finger on pad wait for a minute for it to check the data base and your done.
2007-11-01 01:17:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Nancy Pelosi says that the President should listen to the people.
Is it too much to ask for her to instruct her party to do the same?
Clinton struggles with the illegal immigration issue because she can't even say it.
She consistently aligns herself with the UN term; "Undocumented Migrants" by saying "Undocumented Workers". I guess she assumes that every single illegal is gainfully employed, paying taxes and otherwise full participants in society.
Something tells me, although there may be some who fit the description, generally, it is not the case.
Her confidence in the intellect of the American people was always suspect but I think it has finally come to a screeching halt.
2007-11-01 06:53:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
gomanyes it certainly does give amnesty here is the portion that states it will give citizenship/amnesty to illegal students. do a little more homework before you misinform. i also attached the link to view the entire article. "The “DREAM Act” would also provide a path to citizenship for hardworking immigrant youth who were brought to the U.S. as young children and to pursue higher education or military service." i disagree with the number of people who oppose amnesty. i think it's just over 95%. amnesty has been defeated 3 times just this year. there is talk of another attempt before years end. i'm doing my part.
2007-11-01 03:48:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by T 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
It doesn't surprise me that any of these people are for Amnesty,and it isn't because it's "The right thing to do" it's because they see them as future voters. Two basic truths play into that assumption,Minorities use Social Services at a much higher rate than the general population,and those who overuse social services tend to vote primarily Demoncrat. So they're probably right that they are importing millions of future Democrat voters.
AD
2007-11-01 08:21:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because they can. We and ONLY WE can fix this.
As for Caliente Cabeza de Confetti above, there is nothing more racist than disrupting and weakening the determination of people within a nation. Amnesty does that. All the worst and most pointed comments outside government are of no concern.
...
2007-11-01 01:04:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Because Reid, Clinton, and Obama are a bunch of dum@$$ liberal, anti-american, pro-illegal, "politically correct", homosexual muslims who hate the U.S. and they hate freedom so they're selling out the U.S. so they will be treated better when the mexicans take over. When that happens, everyone else will be made slaves and forced to speak spanish but Clinton, Reid, and Obama will be rich having a good laugh about it while toastign their evil victory with the Mexicans. Reid, Obama, and Clinton do not give a $|-|i+ about the U.S. or it's people. They want to sell us out to the Mexican and islamic terrorists who are trying to take over our country. DO NOT LET THEM!!! DO NOT VOTE FOR THESE ANTI-AMERICAN PRO-ILLEGAL TRAITORS!!! WE NEED TO STOP THE MEXICANS AND THE HOMOSEXUAL MUSLIMS AND THE PRO-ILLEGAL ANTI-AMERICAN TRAITORS LIKE CLINTON AND OBAMA AND REID!!! AS AMERICANS WE ARE A MASTER RACE AND WE NEED TO STAND UP FOR OURSELVES!!!
2007-11-01 01:25:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by White to the core 1
·
6⤊
3⤋
Shouldn't we the people proclaim Reid, Clinton, and Obama illegal, for advocating the breakage of American law, shouldn't we the people Democrat, and Republican alike, truck their buns out of America? Just like 96% of American people, Dem, and Rep alike don't want illegals here? Shouldn't we the people, as we are, join ranks to protect our country from illegal trespassers who take our money, and abuse us, by taking our tax dollars for their livlihood, and medical care? I say Yeh, I say Yeh, and Yeh, again!
2007-11-01 01:57:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
10⤊
3⤋
They are trying to buy votes
2007-11-01 07:54:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Dream Act is NOT an amnesty. It will not change anyone's legal status. It is strictly a college tuition funding bill. But of course, you posted a link from an anti-immigration interest group's website that will try to tell you otherwise.
2007-11-01 03:21:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
8⤋