2007-10-31 16:50:12 · 15 answers · asked by Salsa Shark 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
It's certainly not inability. She can answer the questions, she is just choosing not to. There's a reason for that. Her answers would nail her to a position. That's too much for her, to actually have to take a position on an issue. What she wants is a coronation without the hard part - telling people who you are and what you stand for.
And these Liberal Goofs and Dumbo Democrats are actually letting her get away with it. Pathetic.
2007-10-31 18:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do people think she has problems answering questions? No one has the right answer for all questions? When a person asks a question they have thought it out; the responder has little time to think before they need to answer. Give her a break, she is like the rest of us, we may think we have the answer but unless we have experienced the issue we probably don't have a good answer. She was first lady and learned a lot. She has been a senator for two terms and has learned a lot. But, you can not expect her to be ready to spout off the best answer to a spontaneous question!
2007-11-02 23:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without pleading the fifth? Without ideas? With that same history since first becoming known to the Arkansas public? There's only one possible answer: never!
2007-11-01 00:18:56 · answer #3 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope not, you can't agree with someone's ideas when you don't know what they said.
Did I answer that indirectly enough for you? Will you please vote for me, I have unique experience, though my husband has wrote a letter to keep all our communications while in the White House sealed from the public until 2012. Just trust me (Or I will destroy you)
I may have had a little too much fun with this one, but I love the question. Thanks for entertaining me!
2007-11-01 00:06:22 · answer #4 · answered by Sparxfly 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If she tried to tell the truth she could have a permanent case of lock jaw
2007-11-01 00:02:06 · answer #5 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When was the last time a politician answered a question directly?
2007-11-01 15:53:12 · answer #6 · answered by Raina28 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
never.
the good thing about it is that every question brings the chance of complete breakdown, since she must hide her true feelings in order to get elected.
2007-10-31 23:58:52 · answer #7 · answered by WJ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nah! She'll just give off that annoying cackle and avoid the question.
2007-11-01 18:42:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure - as soon as people stop expecting her to be psychic.
No-one knows what the future holds & it would be stupid to promise something that can't be delivered.
e.g. George HW Bush said "READ MY LIPS - NO NEW TAXES" and 2 years later he raised taxes, BECAUSE CIRCUMSTANCES DEMANDED IT.
2007-11-01 00:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by dryheatdave 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why not?
Just say I look into it and come back to you and put in the pocket and look at it later.
What do you think?
2007-11-01 04:04:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋