which countries would participate in the third world war, and who would be the winner?

Answer 1

I'd say it already started...the pre-lude was 9/11 attack on America.

Act I was the US invasion of Iraq. Act II will be a middle east conflagaration around Israel,Palestine,Syria,Iran axis.

Act III - while US is busy defending Israel, North Korea will take the opportunity to invade the South and China will takeover Taiwan...leading to nuclear showdown similar to the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Act IV - will be the breakdown of the "system", loss in confidence of US economy, long gas lines at the pump, Constitutional rights abolished

Act V - the end...who knows how it will end, but Einstein said World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones....

You ask who would be the winner....in the nuclear age, there is no winner. The only true enemy is war itself.

Answer 2

Assuming no nukes are involved:

USA
Great Britain
Israel
New Republic of Iraq
South Korea
Japan
Australia

versus:

North Korea
China
Russia
Iran

We'd win that one because while each of those four hostile countries have large armies, their technology, experience, training, and very will to fight for their country is decades behind ours' and our allies. Look at Israel- they've never lost a war in their entire history as a Jewish nation. America hasn't lost a war militarily- Vietnam was because of a weak, pacificist media that corrupted the minds of naiive civilians that didn't know **** about what was happening- much like right now in the Middle East. Iran would last about two days if they're lucky. China and North Korea could put up a fight, but not for very long- give or take a month tops. Russia would be the biggest threat, ironically, because their troops have more experience than the others, and better tech than China, but they'd still not last long because of their weak economy.

Just using the Air Force and Navy, we could win that conflict in 100 hours just like we did in the Gulf War. The Marines and Army would be extravagant, though the paratroopers and air assault corps would be an imminent war-winner ground-side.

Throw nukes into the category, and we'd still win, though some of our allies may not.

- we have missiles and even fighter aircraft that can not only track nukes, but intercept them before the warhead is even activated, which is about two or three minutes before reaching the target.

China, NK, R and Iran don't have anything within a century to this sort of tech, so our ICBMs would rain like Katrina upon them, and there'd be this place formerly known as "Far East/Siberia/North Korean Peninsula/Iranian Middle East" that would suddenly no longer exist- just be a radioactive series of craters that would grow back a few years later just like Hiroshima.

Answer 3

Britain and France declared conflict on Germany as a results of fact the Germans violated the contract Germany made with the allies at Munich in 1938. Hitler stated individually stated to Chamberlain that if he ought to get the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia he could make not greater territorial demands in Europe. He blatantly disregarded that contract, you won't be in a position to in basic terms do this and assume different international locations to take a seat down idly via why you in simple terms take in spite of territory you spot in fantastic condition. Do you incredibly think of Britain ought to maintain a conflict with Russia and Germany? Russia became no longer an prompt possibility to Britain's survival, Germany became. As i'm conscious Hitler declared conflict on u . s .? no longer any incorrect way around. the certainty is that various aggressive international locations wanted greater territory that became no longer theres and the allies keeping their hobbies preceded to shield those international locations being overrun. Its conflict somebody needs something and somebody desires to shield it, recover from each and every of the conspiracy concept's and look on the info.

Answer 4

The next world war could come in a variety of forms. In my mind, i think that a Chinese move on Taiwan would cause the US and Japan intervene and the Chinese would rely on help from Russia. The other ww would be a middle eastern affair. Israel would get attacked by Iran and we would get involved and that would stir other radical regimes to line up in opposition.

Answer 5

NATO (Israel would be the first victim of Iran's nukes)

vs

Iran, maybe Russia and others.


Winner: Depends, if the super powers are smart enough to not use nukes then probably NATO...if the world doesn't end.

Answer 6

Probably every country that has an army and the wouldn't be a winner.. Everyone loses.

Answer 7

well I think we're in the middle of one but as for the winner it depends on if Nukes get involved if nukes aren't involved then the US wins if Nukes are involved then we're all screwed.

Answer 8

Once the nukes start flying everyone is involved and no one wins

Answer 9

whoever makes it first with nuclear force non nuclear bombs.
the ones who will win, me and some kangeroos

Answer 10

That's why we need to work on our missile defense...