To round up and deport all illegals if we could ensure only a small percentage would be allowed to sneak back in? Would it be better to round them up, seize all their assets and use that to deport them?
2007-10-31 11:57:07 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I would match funds with Dirty Martini and Chuck Jr., of course I want full results for my investment. They've already wasted my tax dollars, and I may need a surety that it was tax deductible. Why not get a benefit for creating a benefit?
2007-10-31 13:24:46 · answer #1 · answered by Ms.L.A. 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If they are illegal, most likely they do not have assets to speak of. In a pretend government, where one could be assured that the money would actually go to the cause stated, and that the cause would be effective, I would come out of pocket quite a bit to end the illegal immigration problem.
2007-10-31 19:00:54 · answer #2 · answered by Think! 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Everyday it costs every American out of there pocket because they are here. our schools, hospitals, jails,social security benifits, wellfare,plus the jobs they take from hard working Americans . It will probably take a march by the American people to Washington to resolve this issue. The Teamsters will have to shut down transportation to stop the free flow of trucks from Mexico to Canada. And how much is a one way bus ticket ? tractor trailer loads. The only way it will stop is if the American people let everyone know we have had enough. Americans need to stand together and be heard and seen.
2007-10-31 21:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by American mutt 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How much do you think we are paying out of pocket now with the cost of education expenses, medical expenses and other social expenses? Like the post above I want results for the dollars we have ALREADY paid out for the multiple services they receive.
2007-10-31 19:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by Rabid Frog 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I already paid for the service when I payed my taxes that support the Border Patrol and Police,I'm simply demanding that the service already paid for be performed.
YTP
2007-10-31 19:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
How about that .61 cent rate hike in smokes goes to pay for that. Now that would be progress.
2007-10-31 19:00:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I'll match the wise Martini drinker dollar for dollar.
2007-10-31 19:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by chuck_junior 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
What ever it takes as we would get it back from not having to pay all the freebies they get>
2007-10-31 19:42:05 · answer #8 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would personally throw $5000 in that pot if I were guaranteed of the outcome you mentioned.
2007-10-31 19:00:44 · answer #9 · answered by Dirty Martini 6 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Well, I have guns and lots of ammo in my pockets, will that do?
2007-10-31 19:42:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋