Flies and dragons were created from separate DNA. So why did Darwinists call flies dragonflies to trick us into believing there is a transtonal fossils?
Answer me that, athiest!?
2007-10-31 04:21:02 · 16 answers · asked by Bajingo 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol
2007-10-31 04:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You mention that flies and dagonflies were created by separate DNA but you do not support your ascertion with any evidence (or at least a reference for your source), which makes your argument weak.
However even if they were, you must remember that there are organism in this planet that do not have DNA at all (just like viruses) and that doesn't prove the innacuraccy of the theory of evolution. If anything it proves that life can be traced even to the absence of DNA, which makes its scope wider.
2007-10-31 04:30:19 · answer #2 · answered by Makotto 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are actually dragons. And we put the flies on the name to fool people.
And they HAVE found transitional fossils of dragons to dragonflies. It is called a Jesus horse:
http://www.tlpj.org/images/creation_saddle.jpg
2007-10-31 04:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has to do with the 'Gandolph shale' strata of bedrock. When the sorcerer cast a spell on dragons before they could fly, in an attempt to make them into insects, he misread the incantation and ended up with dragons with wings. Later these were deemed to be 'dragonflies'. Any more rediculous questions trying to undermine evolution?
2007-10-31 04:27:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question makes absolutely no sense what-so-ever. Calling flies dragonflies to trick people. You must be hitting the communion wine again.
2007-10-31 04:25:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Im confused by your question! Flies and Dragonflies are two seperate incsects. Dragons arnt real.
2007-10-31 04:24:53 · answer #6 · answered by james h 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"darwinists"....?
Maybe you should study modern evolution. Darwin was a scientist in the 1800s... we've learned a ton since then.
BTW, nearly all U.S. Christian earth & life scientists think evolution is good science... sooo... what makes you think evolution and atheism is correlated?
think much?
2007-10-31 04:24:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
'Dragon' is derived from the Latin 'dragoniosis' which has nothing to do with a dragon. It means 'big' actually. Yeah, that's the ticket.
2007-10-31 04:26:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it's the same thing with butterflies, parkay decided that "I can't believe it's not butter" wasn't good enough so they had to form up with flies, to make there's extra special.
2007-10-31 04:27:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is almost as convincing as the crocoduck and bananas.. I think I need to reevaluate my position regarding evolution.
2007-10-31 04:25:02 · answer #10 · answered by Green 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a definite improvement over the "if man evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys" question. Keep studying....
2007-10-31 04:25:25 · answer #11 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋