2007-10-31 02:45:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hogie, what about all versions after?
2007-10-31 03:25:36 · update #1
Nobody can prove that. People pretty much agree that it is, in fact, the inspired word of God "in its original autographs." We don't have those anymore.
2007-11-01 09:33:34 · answer #1 · answered by cmw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before the King James version, there were several translations that were in competition as the "correct" translation, some with vastly different ideas.
Then, a panel of experts of the day was brought together, and they discussed, argued, studied, and hashed out a translation that they all could agree upon as accurate. Back in that day, the common English language did indeed include 'thee' and 'thou', so of course it makes sense that their translation would be in their version of "Modern English". (In my studies of my own family history, I have seen examples of letters and other documents from that era.)
So, in its day, the King James Version was the truest version possible.
Of course, there are newer versions in more modern English. A popular one is the New American Standard Bible, as well as the New Living Bible and the New International Version.
Each has a modern flair and phrasing, but they all say essentially the same thing. There are many modern bibles that show side-by side comparisons of different translations. My brother has a 4-way that includes King James, New King James, New American Standard, and New International Version. This book shows each passage side by side in each translation with notes explaining any differences, sometimes even quoting the original Greek or Hebrew.
2007-10-31 10:13:04 · answer #2 · answered by Barry F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read all the versions, and compare them. Many say the same thing. Some are easier to read. However, I would never tell someone, you must read "this version or that version". I learned more and grew more from reading the NIV than any other version. However, now that I have much learning, I can now read the kjvr without too many reading issues. I used to have a reading disorder, but have grown out of it as I've gotten older and wiser.
2007-10-31 09:51:45 · answer #3 · answered by bandaidgirl 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I suppose someone could prove it, But I personal can not but it is the version that I prefer. From my own study of the KJV it seems to be accurate to me and it is the most commonly used version
2007-11-01 13:19:52 · answer #4 · answered by Bride of Christ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't such a claim mean that all texts prior to the KJV would be false versions?
.
2007-10-31 10:19:12 · answer #5 · answered by Hogie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope...in fact the King James Version is perhaps the most INACCURATE version out there! Why can't they put it in MODERN english so we can understand it?
I think it's funny how many think Jesus actually spoke using the words thou, thee, etc. If you recall, Jesus spoke Aramaic, NOT english from the 1500's or whatever.
2007-10-31 09:50:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Revelations 11 prophesied the KING JAMES VERSION as the two witnesses brought back to life.
2007-11-01 04:42:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nope.
2007-10-31 09:48:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't it say so inside the front cover?
Next to the reviews?
2007-10-31 09:49:53 · answer #9 · answered by Faesson 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can prove that your questions are boring, repetitive, and pointless.
2007-10-31 09:48:55 · answer #10 · answered by Chris 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋