2007-10-30 22:13:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Well it was definitely better then the last debate... the issues were at least somewhat touched on..
Hillary Clinton: she's not my candidate, but overall she did well... She held her ground, despite being attacked by her opponents and even the moderator lol.. All the focus seemed to be around her last night, first they brought up how she stated that social security is not in jeopardy, but then in 1998, her husband spoke of it's condition... Does she not realize the number of baby-boomers is about to double? She needs to go beyond "fiscal responsibility" and give a valid solution.. telling one individual you intend on raising the cap, while telling the audience there's nothing to worry about.? And I'm still unclear of, ...what income is the middle class/wealthy she is referring to... when the subject of taxes comes up.. A progressive tax is a great idea, but I've looked at the numbers, she's hitting the hard-working middle class.. it's unfair... MSNBC reported afterwards she was caught on her double talk, i.e. giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses..
***And Joseph Biden, after the debate finally called her out on the issue of Iran.. She keeps stating "diplomacy" but who did we negotiate or even speak with before imposing SANCTIONS ON IRAN??? Biden was correct, she is fundamentally wrong..
Barack Obama: one word RHETORIC! does he have a position on anything? did anyone catch that he didn't raise his had on the illegal immigrants/liscense issue... but when he was asked later, it seemed appropriate... and another thing... Factcheck.org, confirmed that Obama's position on Iran is no different then Clinton's... In fact he attempted to sponsor a simliar resolution to the Lieberman (sp?) one's.... "let's talk to people" yeah right...
If I were him, I wouldn't be talking about Mitt Romney's flip flopping, he's just as bad
Biden, Edwards and Kucinich (despite the UFO comment) did the best... Edwards despite being sick, managed to take shots at Clinton... Biden, I believe had the best stance forgien policy... It is irresponsible to label the IRG a terrorist organization... and they do not pose an imminent threat on the United States.. esp when the only have acces to 2.6kg of uranium, while Pakistan has millions... I wish he would gain more traction in the polls, he is by far the best candidate the democrats have..
I was impressed with some... but I'm still sticking to my candidate.. Ron Paul :)
2007-10-31 02:32:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lies drivel more lies one or two half truths and george bush got blamed for everything including crime pestilence and disease
put a stop to the staus quo
vote ron paul in 08
nothing can stop the ron paul revolution
2007-10-30 23:35:34 · answer #2 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh darn, i missed it... anything good happen? i guess ill catch the recap tomorrow during the news.
2007-10-30 22:16:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
CLINTON FOR THE WHITE HOUSE. SHORT AND SIMPLE .
EIGHT WORDS , FOR EIGHT YEARS .
2007-10-30 22:23:40 · answer #4 · answered by 10-T3 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋