Is it wrong for a police officer to conduct an investigation when he has ties to the alleged victim?

Question

Exactly what is an "impartial " and "ethical" investigation of a crime conducted by a police officer?

Should a police officer recuse himself/herself from an investigation when he/she has personal and business ties to the alleged victim? The police officer I am referring to soon discovers his/her own personal information becomes part of the investigation. Isn't it impossible for him/her to remain impartial especially when the alleged victim gives this police officer reason to believe he has "suffered" from the alleged crime and it becomes part of the investigation?

Is there a code of ethics that governs law enforcement to conduct an impartial investigation?

Answer 1

initially, they will respond to a call and that is who will do the investigation. They may request another officer to continue the investigation if they feel they can not continue and be impartial. Generally it can work in your favor if you know the people because you know the history and they will more likely listen to you and respect your decision on the matter at hand. Always contact your superior and tell him of your concerns about the case at hand and they will make the decision. Some small towns are a perfect example because the police may know or be related to many members of the community.

Answer 2

To avoid ANY possible indication of favoritism or partiality , he should disqualify himself from handling any part of the case.