Racism in the United Nations?!?!?!?

Question

Top Five countries subject to UN human rights criticism in 2006.
look for iran in the top 5(NOTE: iran's president said in colombia that there are no Homosexuals in his country, plus he has promised to wipe out the Israelites).




First place: Israel
Second place: Sudan
Third place: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Fourth place: United States of America
Fifth place: Côte d'Ivoire


6 Myanmar
7 Nepal
7 Russian Federation
8 Uzbekistan
9 China
9 Colombia
9 India
10 Iraq
11 Afghanistan
11 Iran*(not even in top 10)



What the U.S. Pays the U.N.- U.S. contributions to the UN in 2005 totalled: $5,327,276,000, and rising.

http://eyeontheun.org/facts.asp?1=1&p=15

Palestinian Focus- Of all subsidiary bodies of the UN General Assembly, six focus on Palestinians, and none on any other specific people in any UN member state(not even Dafur).

The exclusion of Israel from full UN participation

Much of the operations of the UN, including appointments and elections to UN bodies, closed-door negotiations, and information-sharing sessions, take place in the context of five regional groups.


Africa
Asia
Eastern Europe
Latin America and the Caribbean (GRULAC)
the Western Europe and Others group (WEOG).

All UN members are a full member of a regional group except Israel. Israel is merely a temporary member of WEOG for a limited number of purposes.
NOTE: The exclusion of only Israel from full membership in a UN regional group is a violation of the UN Charter, which promises "the equal rights of nations large and small."

There is no UN definition of terrorism- The UN has no internationally-agreed definition of terrorism. The Arab Terrorism Convention and the Terrorism Convention of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) define terrorism to exclude armed struggle for liberation and self-determination. This claim purports to exclude blowing up certain civilians from the reach of international law and organizations. It is central to interpreting every statement that states which have ratified these conventions make in any UN forum purporting to combat terrorism.

UN non-action to combat terrorism- In the wake of 9/11, with great fanfare, the UN Security Council took action to become a leader in the war against terrorism. It adopted resolution 1373 on September 28, 2001. The resolution created the Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) . the CTC was created on September 28, 2001.
Since September 28, 2001 the CTC has NOT named a SINGLE terrorist, terrorist organization or state sponsor of terrorism.

Syria is one of five state sponsors of terrorism designated by the U.S. State Department. It was a member of the CTC for two years, from January 2002 to December 2003.

The five state sponsors of terrorism, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria write reports to the CTC about their compliance with Security Council Resolution 1373. In the absence of any UN definition of terrorism, all of these states readily proclaim they are engaged in a vigorous campaign to combat terrorism.

The Law of the seas treaty A.K.A. L.O.S.T.(reintroduced by 2008 Candidate Joe Biden)
The treaty provides universal legal standards for shipping, fishing, and mining and codifies customary navigation and transit principles already followed by most states. Proponents of the convention, including President Bush, say it will enhance U.S. security on the high seas. But a number of conservative lawmakers remain concerned the treaty may harm U.S. industry and hinder counterterrorism efforts. http://www.cfr.org/publication/13851/is_the_united_states_ready_to_approve_the_law_of_the_sea_treaty.html

Answer 1

The UN is corrupt, racist and anti Semitic, always has been.

If it were a private entity all of its leaders would be in prison.

Instead I get to pay for it with my tax dollars.

Answer 2

Israel is a power that continues to occupy lands that the U.N had meant for the use of the future Palestinian home-land, lands which even now continue to be infested by hoards of Jewish settlers seeking to seize former villages with the covert approval of their government . By persisting in this illegal military occupation,Israel has not behaved at all like a responsible U.N member state. Why should it astonish you then that the U.N treats it appropriately as such? Has Iran ever invaded another nation and expelled its people with the intention of replacing them with ethnic Persian settlers? No? I thought as much. Get an education, you ignorant Zionist retard. Do you even know that past Jewish leaders have called for the mass expulsion of all the West Bank's former inhabitants, Arabs who had been living there centuries before the first Jewish immigrant from Europe came slithering into their home to claim it for themselves? Funny how no one in the U.S ever pays attention to that ,eh?

Idiot below me needs to get a life.

Answer 3

This is a list of governments with regimes that are dangerous...

america is one of those and israel as a military base installed in the middle east to weaken muslims is evil

israel is a bully....

i personally like the jews i know... they have an interesting religion
but the government of israel sucks....

that does not make us anti-semitic

Answer 4

Considering the way the UN works, why does that surprise you?

Answer 5

Questions and other replies from MaggotBoy2006:

Israel is a power that continues to occupy lands that the U.N had meant for the use of the future Palestinian home-land, lands which even now continue to be infested by hoards of Jewish settlers seeking to seize former villages with the covert approval of their government . By persisting in this illegal military occupation,Israel has not behaved at all like a responsible U.N member state. Why should it astonish you then that the U.N treats it appropriately as such? Has Iran ever invaded another nation and expelled its people with the intention of replacing them with ethnic Persian settlers? No? I thought as much. Get an education, you ignorant Zionist retard. Do you even know that past Jewish leaders have called for the mass expulsion of all the West Bank's former inhabitants, Arabs who had been living there centuries before the first Jewish immigrant from Europe came slithering into their home to claim it for themselves? Funny how no one in the U.S ever pays attention to that ,eh?


Should I feel bad that I'm cheating on my trusty friend Tequila tonight and drinking Vodka instead???
Tequila's always been there for me!!!
What would you do?

I'd drink both.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

If i had a time machine, and sent Pres Bush back to 1776....?
and he was one of our founding fathers, and the first president instead of Washington, how different would America be today?

It would be a burning waste-land, dominated by quarreling fundamentalist preachers and their armed followers.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

My teacher winked at me!!?
I was sitting down at my seat when I randomly glanced toward my teachers direction and he happened to smile & wink at me.
Uh oh!

If you're willing to get intimate with him, your academic scores for the subjects he teaches would improve tremendously,I'm sure. Go for it.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Should the US offer citizenship to Iraq's displaced by the war they created?
The USA invaded Iraq and many people have become homeless with no future left in their own country.
There are many ophans with no future as well.
Should the USA do the responsible thing and take them in?

It certainly should. It chose to ignore the well-meant advice that many of its allies offered, choosing instead to spurn them as cowards and traitors, and charged into that country, creating a massive humanitarian crisis that even now plagues that unfortunate country. The Republican scum that have answered so far, are clearly unwilling to take responsibility for a situation that their belligerence and thirst for war has created. Shame on them for this reprehensible lack of moral courage. Why not confiscate their homes and turn them over to Iraqi refugees wanting safe passage, while the erstwhile owners can be exiled to Iraq? I'm sure that given their enthusiasm for wanting radical Islamists to be killed, they'd be more than happy to take a personal hand in fighting the forces that their beloved war-leader has unleashed. A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

Golly, that deserves repeating....A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

A lot of morons here need to be slaughtered by Al-Queda In Iraq fighters.

His words. Not mine.