English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

.
in fact, who but bushboy himself has ever said anything about Iran being a sponsor of terror but bushboy?
My understanding is that nearly the entire world calls us terrorists !!!

and so except for reading it in the newspaper or swallowing bushboy's rhetoric, what other country -- oops, except for Israel of course, and maybe Great Britain -- has called Iran 'terrorist'?

2007-10-30 16:00:12 · 12 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics & Government Politics

I quote from below which is an absolute Truth.
"All the rhetoric about Iran sponsoring terrorism is nothing more than strategic propaganda by those in power now to stir fear in the public and whip up support for another war adventure. Iran's talk about Israel may be just rhetoric but Israel is the party which actually has wiped off a place off the map, Palestine. The Palestinians now are not free but rather living in the world's largest open air prison created by Israel. :

as well as the remainder of what was said.
Much applause !

2007-10-31 12:08:12 · update #1

12 answers

All the rhetoric about Iran sponsoring terrorism is nothing more than strategic propaganda by those in power now to stir fear in the public and whip up support for another war adventure. Iran's talk about Israel may be just rhetoric but Israel is the party which actually has wiped off a place off the map, Palestine. The Palestinians now are not free but rather living in the world's largest open air prison created by Israel. This type of propaganda is actually getting old already. I'm amazed at how many people still fall for it. This is the same type of propaganda that our American government used to lie to the public to justify killing the democratic government of Chile and installing a dictator. Same propaganda that lied to the public so CIA could overthrow the democratic government of Iran in 1953 and install a brute dictator. Same type of propaganda that has brainwashed our populations for so many decades into believing many things that are usually not accurate. Never forget that our American government has and continues to support terrorist organizations around the world that we see work to the benefit of western policies. If we were to unmask our government all the things you will see and discovery will make countries like Iran seem like angels.

2007-10-30 16:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Iran has been a state sponsor of Terrorism since the Carter years. Everyone on Earth knows that Iran sponsors terrorism. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization that is directly funded by Iran. The Iranian military sends troops, weapons and funds to terrorist groups inside Iraq and actually carries out attacks on US troops. Learn the facts dude. You hate America so much, get out. I'm sick of ignorant morons bashing America without knowing the truth about what they are talking about. Now you would rather side with Iran than with America? You just go there and see how well they like you.

2007-10-30 16:56:33 · answer #2 · answered by James L 7 · 1 1

Ok, we get it. You support Ahmadinejad and his terrorist regime. You hate gays, Jews, and like the idea of Iran getting nuclear weapons? Cause that is all part of Ahmadinejad's agenda You would rather see the world end due to a nuclear holocaust than admit that President Bush is right. That's what I have gathered from your question.

2007-10-30 16:26:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s vote last month calling on the administration to declare Iran’s 125,000-member Revolutionary Guard Corps a foreign terrorist organization.

Such a designation, backed by 75 senators including Mrs. Clinton, would have gone beyond the measures taken yesterday by the administration"

2007-10-30 16:14:25 · answer #4 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0 1

Iran made the state sponsored list under Jimmy Carter, you dolt !

I don't give a rat's rear WHAT the world calls us..as long as they take our foreign aid, demand we give them Most Favored status for our trade, and whine if we don't help save thier butts in time of disaster, they can SHUT UP !

Get a reality check, or move somewhere else to badmouth the country I fought and served for.

Pusillanimous liberal !

2007-10-30 16:05:42 · answer #5 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 4 1

I like that...you call the Commander in Chief bushboy in a time of war and ignore the fact that the iranian hitler has stated its his life's goal to erase Israel from the face of the Earth?..wow..talk about turning a blind eye to the thruth

2007-10-30 16:05:44 · answer #6 · answered by Dr Sardonicus 6 · 3 0

They are supplying terrorists with weapons and roadside bombs. Don't talk about something you obviously know nothing about until you are a little more educated. The whole debate is iran getting nuclear capabilities. Why would we let an unstable country like IRAN (Who has been raised to hate us) have nuclear capabilities? It would be like giving them a remote detonator to blow up the us. "Well here ya go! if ya get pissed off just blow us up!"

2007-10-30 16:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The country with 0 nukes(Iran).
threatens the country with 100+ nukes(Israel).
Even scowling Dick Cheney crawled out from under his rock to beat the drum for war against Iran.
Bush makes statement that we have to stop a country before they attain even the KNOWLEDGE to build a atomic/nuclear device.
Where ya been for the past 60 years Dubya?
It's old technology.
even an underachieving college student can do it...

THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR TERRORISM – May 22, 2006

In 1977 a young Princeton University student, on the verge of being dropped from the rolls for unsatisfactory academic performance, came up with an original, if unusual plan, to continue his studies and avoid being expelled. John Aristotle Philips proposed for his term paper project to build an atomic bomb on his own, based entirely on scientific resources available in public libraries in the United States. The project was supervised by renowned nuclear physicist, Prof. Freeman Dyson. Before starting his project John Aristotle Philips knew little about nuclear physics, explosives or how to construct a nuclear device. He was a junior undergraduate majoring in aerospace science. His advisor, Prof. Dyson, did not give Philips any extra help or clues on how to approach the project, or how to resolve the technical problems that every nuclear bomb builder faces. Five months later the undergraduate presented his professors with his work. To the scientists’ astonishment, the device built by the young engineer proved to be fully functional. Had it been equipped with nuclear fissile material it could have been successfully detonated.

http://www.europeancourier.org/terrorism_05_21_2006.htm

and another link to confirm
In 1977, mechanical and aerospace engineering major John Aristotle Phillips ’78 used publicly available documents and textbooks to write his junior paper on how to design a suitcase-sized atomic bomb, in order to dramatize the need for tighter safeguards on nuclear fuels. There was a lot of fallout: Foreign governments tried to buy Phillips’ plans, the FBI sent an agent to campus as a precaution for his safety, he was discussed in presidential debates and on the Senate floor, and he wrote Mushroom: The Story of the A-Bomb Kid with his roommate, David Michaelis ’79, selling the story rights for a made-for-TV movie.

http://www.princeton.edu/~paw/archive_new/PAW05-06/07-0125/whathappenedto.html

And he wasn't even a Physics Major.
What is Dubya gonna do now?
Shock and awe public libraries?

The technology is old.
45 some odd years ago we had atomic artillery shell!!!
from link
One of the smallest nuclear weapons ever built, the Davy Crockett was developed in the late 1950s for use against Soviet troops in West Germany. Small teams of the Atomic Battle Group (charged with operating the device) would be stationed every few kilometers to guard against Soviet attack, using the power of their nuclear artillery shells to kill or incapacitate advancing troop formations and irradiate the area so that it was uninhabitable for up to 48 hours, long enough to mobilize NATO forces.

Dubyas BS isn't scaring me.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)

2007-10-30 16:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by zuezug 3 · 2 1

I don't know, maybe it has something to do with Iran's President declaring that he wants to wipe Israel off the map? Sounds terroristic to me.

2007-10-30 16:03:43 · answer #9 · answered by null 6 · 6 2

Iran is a supplier of weapons not only to Hezbollah but it sends actual troops into Iraq to kill our troops. Iran has sold missiles to Hezbollah, with warheads filled with ball bearings to kill civilians. Hezbollah later used them but the liberals who call themselves humanitarians don't seem to care as long as it's only Jewish civilians being killed.

2007-10-30 16:07:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers