Yes. Sad but true. Condi Rice, National Security adviser, was (supposedly) a "Soviet Union" expert, she was more concerned about the Stars Wars missile defense....after 9/11 she said "No one could have imagined people would hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings" well apparently no high level people in the Bush Administration.
Summer Breezy, the masterminds of 1993 WTC were captured, tried and convicted and are in jail. Clinton tried several times to get OBL. The Millenium bomb plot was foiled. Clinton told Bush terrorism and Al Queda were number threat of course they ignored him.
2007-10-30 15:04:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Bush and the Bin Ladens made a oil deal. Basicly Im going to say to explain this without haveing to type a long assed awnser to say that Bush and the Bin Laden family made a buisness deal saying that the United States would make a huge profit from buying Saudi Arabian oil, and bush and bin laden formed 9/11 as a cover up for his program, And the iraqi war was just an extra security measure to ensure that the plan wouldnt be uncovered. Even thoegh the Iraqi war has exceeded $500 billion in cost it seems like the US is loseing money. WRONG, the US is accualy makeing money exceeded $500 billion, and Bin Laden (who controls the Saudi Arabian oil fields) is paying for the Iraqi war. I wont go into detail about how Bin Laden is makeing a profit or this is just going to be one long assed awnser. If youre interested and want the rest of the story just e-mail me.
2007-10-30 15:08:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by EvilX 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
And Bush, even in 2004, didn't even know when it happened.
I have a record in office, as well. And all Americans have seen that record. September the 4th/2001, I stood in the ruins of the Twin Towers. It's a day I will never forget.
--George w. Bush
Marlton, NJ
10/18/2004
Every other person in the country knew it was 9/11 but not Georgie boy. Would you have got it so wrong?
2007-10-30 15:16:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ferret 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, I did.
If you care to go into the archives of AP etc you will find that not only was Bush warned repeatedly, we were warned repeatedly by stories about Al Qaeda's intentions.
Massive measures were not necessary to preempt the attacks. Increased security measures at air terminals would have sufficed.
The attacks were allowed to take place so International Corporate Fascists could implement the circumvention of the Constitution of the United States of America which has always been the greatest obstacle to their world dominance.
Crawl down the feces hole from whence these monsters come, if you dare, and you will find the truth.
ConsortiumNews.com
2007-10-30 15:11:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
HaHaHaHa! You know, the funny thing that everybody forgets right about this time is that most of if not all of a presidents problems come from a lack of getting the job done on the part of the president who was in office before. I would also imagine that they did have at least one meeting on the subject before hand due to our state of the art anti missile defense that was put into place just prior to 9 11. I want to hear what you have to say in the next couple of years after Hillary has been in the white house for a while because once she gets in we'll all be F'd.
2007-10-30 15:15:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chris 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
Not only that, but they unequivocally and unilaterally rejected Bill Clinton's warnings about Al Qaeda. Because he was a Democrat.
Right, Cons?
2007-10-30 15:12:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
But...they did have many drills and exercises of planes flying into the pentagon and WTC before 9-11 yet got on the TV afterwards and told the sheep that "no one could've envisioned using airplanes as weapons". They sheep swallowed it like they always do.
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB and EVERYBODY KNOWS IT!!!!
2007-10-30 15:11:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by NONAME 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
I dont support bush but there is nothing you can do about him. you sit and complain and are slowly making your way to your first heart attack. I would support you in your push against the whitehouse but I dont think we have the same political agenda. You probly say things like, those damn republicans are at it again, and all republicans are evil. I think its you bi-partisonship that weakens us. instead of us all working together to make this a better country you want to argue about red and blue. what a bunch of sh*t. you cant really stand on either side and agree with everything they say. Its impossible unless your are a chump pushover.
2007-10-30 15:13:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by bob hoskins 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
yes and condi demoted richard clark because he kept bringing up al qaida
2007-10-30 21:32:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by moderation 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey, did you know that during the Clinton administration, Bin Laden was offered up to the United Staes and President Clinton did nothing? So I think if you want to blame someone it should be Bill.
2007-10-30 15:27:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rodent 2
·
0⤊
4⤋