English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How many "coincidences" before you become a "coincidence- theorist"?

2007-10-30 12:51:10 · 19 answers · asked by NONAME 1 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Always remember that in the Law of International Intelligence the intelligence agencies of each countries are willing to sacrifice the lifes of a few citizens to further the economic or political progress of the nation. There is no better example of this than CIA which is responsible for countless deaths throughout the world and here in America as well. My believe is that CIA knew of the impending 9/11 but didn't act on it since not doing so will enable the country to justify new wars in the world with hidden agendas.

2007-10-30 13:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

You are correct in asserting that there are numerous lies doing the rounds concerning the events of 9/11.
However, I read the official report (in its entirety) and other sources from scientists, physicists, engineers and other experts from around the globe and I don't find the need to tell myself any lies to make it work for me.
It's really not that difficult to sort through the valid and verifiable facts vs. some of the utter nonsense that makes up the fictional "documentaries" and conspiracies.

2007-10-30 20:18:38 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2 1

None.

How many lies do you tell yourself to make the conspiracy theory work for you?

Are these some of them?

LIE: There were puffs of dust when the towers collapsed, so that means there were bombs
FACT: Actually, this happens all the time, so it means nothing.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4#puffs

LIE: No other skyscraper fell from fire alone
FACT: The towers fell mainly from the columns being knocked out by the planes, the fires only helped.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse" to hear NIST explain it.
Also, a steel frame building did collapse from fire alone, in Madrid Spain, 2/12/2005, the 32-storey “Windsor” building.

LIE: WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn't hit by a jet
FACT: Five other large buildings were destroyed by the falling towers, so the collapse of WTC7 is not surprising. (The Marriott World Trade Center, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center. ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks

LIE: No plane wreckage was found at the pentagon
FACT: Hundreds of rescue workers found wreckage & pictures of this abound
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)

LIE: Bush's brother was "head" of security at the WTC
FACT: His brother was on the Board of Directors & left before 9/11. The Board has nothing to do with day-to-day operations

LIE: The collapse at WTC looked like a “controlled demolition.”
FACT: Real, non-government demolition experts laugh at this. Here’s what they said in the leading demolition journal in the world:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

LIE: The towers fell at "free fall speeds"
FACT: NIST said they fell far slower than this
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm (point 6, especially at end)

LIE: Firemen heard "explosions"
FACT: NIST reviewed the testimony of over 500 fireman & found no evidence of bombs
See Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

LIE: Prof Jones says the collapse violates the "laws of physics"
FACT: The engineering dept at his own University, Brigham Young U, has denounced Jones calling him “disturbing”
http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm


LIE: Melted steel was found
FACT: NIST says “In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires.” See point 7a at
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

LIE: You can’t make cell phone calls from a plane.
FACT: It’s against FAA regulations, but everyone knows you can make cell calls. The connection tends to cut off, but it can be done.

LIE: NORAD was blocked from shooting down the jets.
FACT: The controllers didn’t know what was going on, so they didn’t call NORAD until it was too late.

LIE: NIST said it can’t explain the collapse completely
FACT: NIST’s computer model showed that the towers collapsed from the impact & fire. NIST merely said it couldn’t calculate where the pieces of the Towers would fall once collapse started.
See Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

LIE: No plane wreckage was found at Shanksville, PA
FACT: Lots of plane wreckage was found; the largest piece was an engine fan.

LIE: The steel was not examined by NIST.
FACT: The steel was extensively examined by NIST. See NCSTAR 1-3 “Mechanical and Metallurgical Analysis of Structural Steel” at
http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-3index.htm

LIE: The steel was rushed away so no one could study it
This LIE was thoroughly investigated by the staff of “Implosion World” who traced every step of how the steel was handled. The senior editor personally confirms that the steel was not rushed away. http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
(Point 6 )

LIE: The twin towers fell into their own footprint so it was a controlled demolition
FACT: The did not fall into their own footprint. They destroyed numerous nearby buildings including 7 World Trade Center, the Marriott World Trade Center, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center , & the Deutsche Bank Building. Two of these buildings were not even in the WTC plaza (Deutsche & St Nicholas)

LIE: Concrete was completely “pulverized” at WTC
FACT: You always get a big dust cloud when a building falls. Demolition experts say it means nothing.
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

LIE: Maybe thermite was used in the WTC.
FACT: The champion of this theory is Prof Jones. Jones was forced to admit that the "distinctive fingerprint" of thermite was missing from the steel. This was published in a famous demolition journal. Read it yourself:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

2007-10-30 21:16:14 · answer #3 · answered by J 5 · 0 0

I want to talk to the illusionist who orchestrated those "imaginary" planes that hit the WTC....you wouldnt believe 9/11 if they had actually flown up your a..! All those stunt people who jumped to escape flames were real pros. Get a life loser.

2007-10-30 19:59:57 · answer #4 · answered by vaar69 3 · 3 1

Not a single one. Unlike you that must ignore facts that are so blatantly obvious that only a fool would chose to ignore.

2007-10-30 19:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Gee a guy with a anti-Semitic name claiming people who understand facts, physics and reality have a problem... interesting...

Gee you any relation to the user who has the avatar called Crypto Jew girl? heh, anti-Semitic conspiracy nut... BIG surprise *Sarcasm*

2007-10-30 19:57:02 · answer #6 · answered by Stone K 6 · 5 1

Yo mama wears jackboots! Hahahahahahahahahaha!

2007-10-30 19:55:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Being someone who is allot smarter than you I believe the official report

2007-10-30 20:03:11 · answer #8 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 2 3

How did you get away with that name - a Nazi conspiracy theorist....

huh.

2007-10-30 19:54:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

None. Another thing many of us can agree on: You are an idiot.

2007-10-30 19:58:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers