Invincible
2007-10-30 12:07:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
These two words are not synonymous, but so close in meaning i would not use them together. You wouldn't say, "the pasture is verdant and green. The sky was blue and azure." Using two words that mean nearly the same thing is redundant and weakens your statement.
Also are you describing a person, a military campaign, or what? Invincible connotes a person or group of persons, like an army, or a quality that is being personified like invincible Wisdom or Justice or Truth. Unstoppable can be a machine, a person, a plague. Invincible also implies a positive opinion, whereas unstoppable is neutral. Negative opinion about the same trait would be relentless or stubborn. Invincible is definitely stronger but may be hyperbole. Sometimes less is more.
2007-10-30 19:40:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lillian T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm trying to figure out how you would use a gauge to remove eyes. Do you mean gouged out? If so that's a word used a lot. I'd say try to find something more original. 'Scooped' doesn't sound horrifying enough for what is happening. Are they using a spoon to remove the eyes? Maybe 'spooned'. But look at the sentence again. If someone was spooning out my sister's eyes, I wouldn't be looking on in fear. I'd be screaming in terror, fighting to get to her, scrabbling my fingers against the person doing the work. So look at how you can make this whole sentence stronger and more believable. Maybe break it apart. You have the girl watching, and rewrite that to show her terror, even if she's just frozen in terror (although that's a cliche). Then, to add to the reader's terror, show the person doing the deed. Instead of telling the readers the eyes were scooped out, show us the black robed hulking figure digging fingers into the eye sockets, pulling them out dripping...more detail here will leave a greater impression and make for stronger writing. Remember, always show, don't tell. Good luck.
2016-05-26 03:27:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Invincible" is definitely more powerful, but I wouldn't necessarily use them side by side because that would be redundant. Find another characteristic of whatever you are describing and put it next to "invincible." Or try modifying "invincible" with an adverb like "incredibly." Hence, you would have, "incredibly invincible."
2007-10-30 12:12:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unstoppable sounds as though you can still be hurt, but you'll keep on coming. Invincible sounds both unstoppable and, well, impervious to damage. So, invincible holds a deeper impact for me.
2007-10-30 12:09:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by wendy_the_pyro 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Invincible!!
2007-10-30 12:10:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♥Twilight♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Invincible sounds better
2007-10-30 13:03:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by audioworld 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Given what you're trying to achieve, lead with unstoppable and finish with invincible. You can intensify the impact of those adjectives with some really image-inspiring adverbs.
2007-10-30 12:11:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Captain S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Invincible has more impact. Try using a thesaurius, Rogets is good you get lots of different combinations makes composing much easier. Crosswords are good practice too.
2007-10-30 12:10:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Invincible like in the famous Peruvian quote
"Vosotros somos invincibles!"
2007-10-30 12:08:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋