2007-10-30 11:49:32 · 12 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
its sad because troops support liberals
2007-10-30 11:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by mission_viejo_california 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
My University has a ROTC program. I think there may be more then one of these programs in the United States. I guess if they are banning soldiers from campuses then someone must have forgot to tell the campuses. I share more then one class with soldiers still on active duty improving themselves for promotion. I guess the liberals missed those as well. Perhaps my state is an exception but I have never heard of a policy that forbids soldiers to enter University grounds.
I think you might have been misinformed. Is this something that Rush Limbough told you about? It must be true if it is so I better tell the President of my University that all soldiers must be expelled immediately to conform with liberal laws.
2007-10-30 12:00:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It has nothing to do with a party. It has nothing to do with supporting or not supporting the troops.
(SIGH, so so tired of the words liberals, democrats, republicans, neocons, dear me.)
It has to do with talking to young adults and promising the world, when it isn't theres to give away.
EX: Wanna see Hawaii? China?? How about Cancun?
Sign here.....
Then its off to boot camp, and Iraq or some other place OTHER than Hawaii.
What's worse is the Fed. gov't trying and sometimes succeeding in pulling aide to schools that won't allow them on campus.
If they want to join they will find a way.
Like Pig says,,,,why aren't they at private schools? Or in lilly white rich Fairfield, CT. No, they are in Dearborn, MI, or Chicago. Think that is by coincidence? They promise them money and a future (way out). As the Commanders see it, casualties of war. Just not the rich ones, or their children.
2007-10-30 12:08:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's right get em while they're young. To hell with their education we need the bodies. We need the fodder for the enemy's cannon. Yup that is the con way of doing it. Maybe those recruiters could lurk off campus and recruit from the dark alleys and corners or wait until the young'uns come to the recruiting station. Let them soak up all that learning and then wham! you get them as they leave their 6th grade classes.
2007-10-30 12:09:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This lib supported the troops by giving eight and a half years of my life in service to my country... How about you, hero?
EDIT: Wow, I got a thumbs-down for being proud of my service... must have been a pseudo-con.
2007-10-30 11:54:33 · answer #5 · answered by Fretless 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If liberals supported getting American soldiers killed for oil and arms sales, then you'd say that libs were "real Americans"
That's just incredible... it really is!
2007-10-30 11:58:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Liberals do not support the troops. Some of them say they do, but that is just to attract voters. Liberals have been known to say anything to get votes.
2007-10-30 11:52:12 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Isn't amazing that our troops are out there fighting to protect the right of people to trash them?
2007-10-30 11:55:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Liberals and all other educated parents don't support them peddling their fascist propaganda there.
BTW, why doesn't the military bother sending recruiters to private schools like the ones Gay Male Cheerleader Bush attended? LOL!
2007-10-30 11:53:28 · answer #9 · answered by cons_are_cowards 2 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Do conservatives beat their heads into the wall every morning in order to keep buying their own garbage?
2007-10-30 11:55:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋