English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How can you not remember the fictitious WMDs tha Saddam was hiding?
The linking of Iraq to 9/11?
That he steered troops away from Bin Laden to find Saddam.
Do you guys love big oil that much?

2007-10-30 09:55:24 · 25 answers · asked by Semp-listic! 7 in Politics & Government Politics

I laugh, the child happens to be my Godson. I laugh at morons too.

2007-10-30 10:03:39 · update #1

Loyal B., do you hear youself. You guys are speaking about Clinton, a man who left us with a surplus of finances and has been out of office for 8 count them 8 years! your boy is a jack in the box and you can't admit it!

2007-10-30 10:06:12 · update #2

Sid V., Watch your mouth. If you insult a man, do so to his face. I served too moron, or don't you recognize what a profile is for?

2007-10-30 10:21:43 · update #3

25 answers

No I think the DEMS and the media have made it to look that way. Remember, they attacked us first, Not just Bin Laden but the Shiites and radical Muslims as well.
If GB had sat around like a pantie-waste we definitely would have been attacked more but he reacted and rightly so.
My son served twice and may have to go again but he is proud to be protecting our country for the demmies as well as the REPUBLICANS. By the way he is a SGT. what are you?
Sorry Semper, I have respected you thus far.

2007-10-30 18:04:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

1. "Fictitious" WMD?
You are aware, are you not, that Saddam DID have WMDs, had used them against Iran and the Kurds, and had failed to document that he'd destroyed them, per the ceasefire (not peace treaty) he signed? And the UN inspectors were using his own inventory reports as the basis for verifying that all the WMD, all the materials and all the delivery systems were destroyed?

Specifically, he never provided proof that he'd destroyed the VX nerve agent his people had been trying to manufacture.

2. Nobody in the Bush administration or in the Republican party has ever indicated that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. Within a week after 9/11, Bush stated this fact, and he's never said anything different.

3. No troops were removed from Afghanistan to go into Iraq. There was a natural logistical limitation on the number of troops that could be deployed and supported in Afghanistan.

So, you've managed to say three untrue/idiotic things in an effort to slam Republicans. I'm sure your ranting is a big hit with the movonmoron brigade, but they don't care much for facts or logic either.

2007-10-30 17:17:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." Some attribute this to Josef Goebbels- Propaganda Minister for Hitler's Third Reich.

2007-10-30 17:16:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I love debating, that is why I wish I met you personally.

1) I don't have amnesia, and since I am now registered to vote, I am now part of the Republican party.

2) I remember well the WMD's of Iraq, I also remember them finding tons of materials to make WMD's, and tons of those materials Saddam used on his own people.

3) We can argue this all day, but have you and your fellow Democrats forgotten that in the beginning Bush stated that anyone harboring terrorists would be considered the enemy? Iraq was harboring and supporting the terrorists that attacked us.

4) My last argument goes with this one, Saddam was part of the enemy. Would you and your liberal friends prefer that a dictator be in power ruthlessly murdering his own people?

5) The world runs on oil, and as long as we receive our oil by legal fair methods, then I'm fine with us getting it. But I still think car companies should start to make hydrogen based cars.

2007-10-30 18:18:15 · answer #4 · answered by Joel 2 5 · 4 2

You're beginning to sound like a fanatical left wing nut case which completely discredits your argument of outright hatred for republicans in general and the president in particular. Your assertions are not based in fact, but in left leaning political wishful thinking.

2007-10-30 18:59:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

"...fictitious WMDs tha Saddam was hiding?..."
Fictitious? You know as an absolute fact that Saddam didn't have them moved out of Iraq in the weeks before Baghdad fell?

"...The linking of Iraq to 9/11..."
You know as an absolute fact that Saddam didn't support Al Qaeda, the terrorist group responsible for 9-1-1?

"...That he steered troops away from Bin Laden to find Saddam..."
The troops that found Saddam in his hole were part of the US force that invaded and took Iraq. They hadn't been 'steered away' from anything.

"...Do you guys love big oil that much?..."
Ever thought about what our civilization would be like without 'big oil'? Can you say "stone age."

2007-10-30 17:05:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 5

Nope.
Silly childish question.
I'm enjoying all that free oil that we are getting from Iraq.

(You must have missed the news for months, when Democrats said Saddam had WMDs.
Democrats Demanded that Bush do something about it.)
Cool!!!!!

2007-10-30 17:06:01 · answer #7 · answered by wolf 6 · 4 2

Hi Buddy :-)
why are you letting them get to you, you know that "Republicans" (with the exception of Tom T.) have "bean" problems...they're full of gas! :-)

We know that a Democrat will get into office, they're just mad because it's going to a woman too :-)
stay sweet

2007-10-30 17:27:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It's not amnesia. Just small minded people who can't find fault in their party, as if it were one of their misbehaving children. They clearly care more about party then country

2007-10-30 17:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by golfer7 5 · 2 1

Saddam was guilty of genocide...Bin Ladin had dealings with Saddam, Al Qaeda trained in Northern Iraq. What do you want, a war on American soil the next time the terrorists strike within our borders?

I can find fault within my own political system, both major parties have faults, but this question of Iraq is still answered by the disgusting genocide portrayed by Saddam and the links between he and Bin Ladin.

2007-10-30 17:05:19 · answer #10 · answered by Mizz SJG 7 · 6 6

fedest.com, questions and answers