Aren't you saying in effect that the Clintons are WAY SMARTER than BushCo?
2007-10-30 09:25:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
And if the Clintons DID kill people who threatened them, then why are Paula Jones and Ken Starr still alive today?
2007-10-30 09:28:32 · update #1
The point is, the two views are wholly inconsistent unless you believe the Clintons are exponentially diabolically smarter than BushCo.
2007-10-30 09:31:30 · update #2
Bryan, I tend to believe what the factual evidence proves.
And there's no proof that there were any WMD's in Iraq.
So the most rational conclusion is that there were no WMDs in Iraq.
2007-10-30 09:37:31 · update #3
I believe that anybody who believes either of those things is a complete loon.
2007-10-30 09:35:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you believe that Bush 'scammed' America on Iraq...
if you believe there were no WMDs in Iraq prior to the invasion...
if you believe that Bush has some nefarious plan to take over and declare himself dictator...
if you believe that Bush "stole" the election in 2000...
then you're just the right kind of idiot to believe anything that is said by a Clinton.
Being SMARTER doesn't mean BETTER, numbskull.
I'd rather have a good man who isn't a genius but has his heart in the right place than a crooked woman who is really bright and uses her intellect to pull the wool over people's eyes with her lies and deceit.
2007-10-30 09:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Paula and Ken made the big time. They got their 15 minutes of fame and became bullet proof.
2007-10-30 09:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Clintons do two types of assassinations: 1) the literal version, and 2) character assassination.
Barak will be able to give an "Amen" to #2 before its all over.
2007-10-30 09:31:16 · answer #4 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you're using an Urban Legend
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
2007-10-30 09:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All those millions spent on the Starr investigation, and after all that all they could get on him was a ******** with an intern.
Nothing about murders or assasinations.
2007-10-30 09:32:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Someone get help to BRYAN ASAP-what's left of his brain is rapidly imploding.
2007-10-30 09:36:50 · answer #7 · answered by golfer7 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WE already said she didnt Off ALL the people..she only killed those who were the biggest pain in the necks..like those who exposed her having crooked campaign managers and stealing money.
2007-10-30 09:32:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's sort of a catch 22 with Bush. If you believed he has been completely honest, then it means he was incompetent at intelligence, planning and executing. If you believe he was dishonest, then it means he was competent, intelligent, planned and executed a plan that was incompetent, lacked intelligence, lacked planning and lacked execution.
2007-10-30 09:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋