A question to atheists. Can you prove God doesn't exist?

Question

I was confronted by a young atheist who said he could never believe in God because no one can prove His existance. Can you prove He doesn't exist?

He says he believes in reincarnation instead. Can anyone who believes like he does prove to me that reincarnations exist?

I am stomped why Faith in God is wrong but it takes faith in the beliefs of reincarnation to accept this concept.

Answer 1

Taking the time to even ask or answer a question from atheist, is not worth while. If it is meant for us to talk to these individuals, we will know. Have you noticed that those who claim to be atheist and agnostics, when on their death bed, these people pray and ask forgiveness. God loves every lost sheep that comes home. Thank God. My sister was agnostic/atheist although she was raised Amish. Two weeks before she died, she did pray.

Answer 2

How about proving that God exists? No one can do that either. Neither side will ever win in this argument. It is kind of like arguing about Evolution and Creation and so on.

I am atheist and though I don't believe in the literal idea of reincarnation, I believe that our bodies provide sustenance for other creatures and those in turn provide sustenance for others and so on. Thus our matter lives on. If you want to call that reincarnation then so be it.

Answer 3

How do you prove color to the blind or music to the deaf? How do you prove there is a difference in taste from steak to strawberries to those without a sense of smell or taste buds?
Maybe belief in God or in reincarnation, or Buddha, or Jehovah is born in both environment, intelligence and somehow in a cellular level. Is it possible the Creator, by whatever name, has such a deep sense of humor and irony that we are given a pre-set belief pattern so we have much to enjoy and debate when our spirits leave this earthly plane?
Of course, I can't prove it, but I feel it!

Answer 4

you're making assumptions on defective information. as an occasion, in case you have been best suited then the greater believers in a inhabitants could advise that the final wellness of that united states could be greater perfect than greater secular countries. France a mundane united states with a oftentimes irreligious inhabitants has the main effectual wellness provider in the international. the u . s ., the main religious united states in the western international, has the thirty seventh effectual wellness care in the international, (seem it up, stats by using the OECD). in spite of all of those prayers the irreligious French will stay longer, will stay longer devoid of ailment, might have much less psychological wellness subject concerns, fewer divorces, much less crime, have decrease toddler mortality, fewer drug issues, fewer abortions. My opinion is which you do no longer in all danger understand what good judgment is and which you're able to absolutely study a controversy, getting all the information, globally no longer in basic terms domestically, in the previous you burst off a million/2 ******. Edit: nicely church attendances is an indicator of being an energetic Christian and France it fairly is 12% in the u . s . it fairly is 40 3%. fairly you're no longer claiming that France is a greater Christian united states than the u . s ..

Answer 5

Here's a better question for him IF he's into the religion of "Evolution"...

Have him explain the "evolution" of the eye. It's really quite a leap of faith to believe that a receptor in the back of the brain eveolved, while an eye itself eveolved, but they were never connected, they simply evolved over time & miraculously connected & the brain could miraculously understand the images...LOL...and there's so much more to it than that. I think the eye's made up of 5 seperate items, all of which had to develope independantly, then ultimately link together to work.

Now, while that's a jump in faith, try this...evolutoin claims survival of the fittest...so while these "freakish eye developing (still blind...just humps on their head and such) creatures" are still in the developing stage, wouldn't that clearly be a dis advantage to the other so called normal creatures? Thus by definition they (the eye developing creatures) wouldn't survive?

It's much to detailed to explain here, but I think you can get the drift.

Here's a cool concept, why can't you belive in both God & science? I dig science, and I believe in God.

Answer 6

I have beliefs and ideas... but they don't include a "God". I have never been able to wrap my brain around the whole Jesus and God thing... there is no proof. And no I cannot prove the other.
I think it's impossible because we have these different beliefs/religions to comfort us. How can you prove a thought???

Answer 7

I don't think the non-existence or existence of God can be proved or disproved. You either accept it on faith or you don't.

Answer 8

Burden of proof is on the believer. If I say Vampires are real, it's not on you to prove they are real, its on me to prove they are real because i'm the one making the proclamation of their existence. Same with God. All Gods in all religions were made up because man couldn't explain the unexplainable.

Answer 9

He likely to be a Buddhist, and no one can prove that God excists or doesn't excists.

Answer 10

His contradictory need of proof is puzzling. I believe in God. That is Faith. That is what all religions are based on... Faith in something they cannot touch with their senses.