Absolutely. Chances are, you wouldn't catch on fire if you bolted through it, because you create air as you're running and it creates a short, but effective blanket against the flames.
2007-10-30 08:38:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well if it is the only way out yeah but how much water is on the other side and how far will i have to go to find enough to put me out? lol
2007-10-30 08:39:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ru2tipsy2c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now you didn't say that I'm already in the fire. So perhaps the fire is in front of me, so I'd just turn around and run the opposite way.
2007-10-30 08:38:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cheryl W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I would. A hard sprint through fire won't cause as much pain as just laying there to die for the fire to burn me completely.
2007-10-30 08:38:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by arachnid-man 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes, because eventually there is a risk of being engulfed in flames. The water would put out the fire . . . .
2007-10-30 08:39:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tina R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes cos i would rather get drowned than burnt as you would look deformed >< and even if you get caught in the fire..hey theres water!
2007-10-30 08:50:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd kick myself for being stupid enough to get caught on the non water side seeing as how I'd burn to death getting to the water I should have thought to stay near.
2007-10-30 08:38:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. I'd rather do that then burn to death because dying through burning is like a slow way to die and it really hurts x
2007-10-30 08:38:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You'd still get burnt so does it really matter? haha but if it's the only way out of the situation then yeah, I suppose
2007-10-30 08:37:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe, if it was a small fire. I would prefer to jump over it though.
2007-10-30 08:37:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by barbwire 7
·
1⤊
0⤋