English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Normally, I hear of World War II vets having served in either Europe or the Pacific, but I was told that my grandfather served in both theaters. Were there very many soldiers who fought in both Europe and the Pacific during World War II?

2007-10-30 08:15:17 · 6 answers · asked by tangerine 7 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

There weren't too many soldiers who fought in both theaters, but it was not impossible, especially if there was a hospital stay or an assignment away from the front lines in-between.

2007-10-30 09:06:47 · answer #1 · answered by NC 7 · 2 0

I wouldn't think so. The army was the predominant military service in Europe, but not so in the Pacific theater.

The navy, marines, air-force and army played about equal roles I would imagine in that theater.

And I would suspect that the logistics of transferring a serviceman, from one theater to another, would prohibit such tactics.

Wotan

2007-10-30 08:26:46 · answer #2 · answered by Alberich 7 · 1 0

the promoting factor of the grew to become into grew to become into Pearl Harbor. yet there have been varied below mendacity reason, statting interior the 1800's. learn up on what took place to the Chineese for the period of the conflict. Which u . s . a . attacked u . s . a . properity? The Germans in straightforward terms shelled one city off the hot England coast on the initiating of the conflict.

2016-11-09 20:51:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

My old WWII Navy buddy did. Had two purple hearts. He said he tried to go AWOL passing through the Panama Canal.

2015-01-22 20:55:08 · answer #4 · answered by Mark A. Miller 1 · 0 0

yes, campaigns were taking place in both places.

2007-10-30 08:23:48 · answer #5 · answered by robert s 5 · 0 0

about 5,000 . . .2,348 died

2007-10-30 08:22:32 · answer #6 · answered by JOSEPH R 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers