Voting for/against Hilary BECAUSE she's female?

Question

We've all heard the lip service paid to the idea of voting for the best candidate without regard to gender. However, I heard an estimate that 25% of female Republicans were going to cross party lines because they want to see a woman in the White House--without even knowing who the Republican opponent will be. Blatant gender bias? or justifiable from a historical perspective? What about men (or women, for that matter) who would vote against Hilary because she's female? Sexist? or supportable, given the "opposition's" position?

Answer 1

Can't vote for her. She's openly urging women to vote for her because of her sex. When JFK ran for President in 1960 as a Catholic, he had to make very clear that his religion wouldn't play a part in his decision-making. Hillary is doing exactly the opposite. Double standard? I think so. Why do women always seem to get a free pass?

Answer 2

I am voting for her because I am a democrat, I think she'd do an excellent job. I think it's time to try a female president, but that's not my main reason for voting for her.

I will not criticize her for wanting the support of female voters ONLY because women were once not allowed to vote, and that was not fair. Now we are in a position to vote for a female president and I see no reason why she shouldn't ask the ladies to show some support. People can vote for who they choose - and for whatever reasons they choose, regardless of who likes it. If they could disregard votes and refuse a re-vote between Bush and Gore, then there's nothing wrong with Hillary asking for votes from the ladies, so you gotta roll with it in politics because it's a proven game of dirty pool.

Answer 3

I would think that republican women choosing to vote for a democratic woman would be more an indication that the men running on the republican side are of extremely poor quality, rather than them voting for someone based solely on their gender. I think republican women are a bit smarter than you're making them out to be. That's just my opinion though.

I personally like Hillary Clinton, and if she becomes the democratic candidate I will certainly vote for her. But I was raised to be a good liberal, so that influences my vote a lot.

Answer 4

I don't believe in identity politics, but when someone who isn't a white male is poised to win a primary for the first time, it's inevitable. I would only support Hillary if she did win the primary. For now, I'm for Obama.

Answer 5

voting against Hillary for the fact that she is a man and not a woman...that's right ..I have proof..Chelsea is adopted..neither one of the Clinton boys have red hair..and they only had one kid..come on now..and Bill is out getting busy with much better looking women than Hillary..if Hillary was a woman she would have had more than one kid ..after all Bill is a horn dog..and she would have many abortions..some thing tells me old Billy don't where a condom at all..so it must be using liberal logic that Hillary is really a guy..a dude a man..

Answer 6

the 1st-value character for the interest is very what we can could be staring at for. Having a "female" President shouldn't even enter into the equation. all people with in simple terms precise ethical fiber, a extreme degree of intelligence, astounding judgment, a guy or woman who's a sturdy choose for of character. everybody who will embody themselves with the suitable and the brightest advisers. regrettably, Mrs. Clinton chosen a bent philanderer for a husband and that left the mummy and dad of usa having to grant an evidence for to their very youthful impressionable little ones why the subject of sexual undertaking in the White residence was once on the 6:00 information each nighttime. you're by using no potential incredibly finding for a significant respond or you mustn't have made the assertion with regards to what "each guy desires." JFK replaced into as quickly as in all danger as a lot or greater of a playboy. we can regularly by using no potential understand. the great difference is he replaced into the President of the U.S. At a time while journalism did no longer attain down into the gutter to document the information. bill Clinton knew he replaced into as quickly as residing in one greater time and partaking in by using an entire diverse set of rules. inspite of each thing, he replaced into our President, he will could have chosen a miles better course! to place the cherry on top of his risky judgement, he had the audacity to lie approximately his movements! Please! the guy isn't dumb and he knew what he replaced into as quickly as being asked in regards to "sexual relatives individuals." I say, save away! Write your books and convey at the same time you funds from speaking engagements. do no longer carry our united states back to moral lowground by using moving back into the White abode!

Answer 7

Nope. Voting against her because of her health plan. It scares the living daylight out of me.

Answer 8

The requirements to vote in the US are, pretty much:
1. be a citizen;
2. be 18+ years of age.

You don't need to be smart, you don't need to be educated and you don't need to justify your vote.

As people vote for a candidate based on his being Catholic, her being pro free-trade, him having school-age children, her being a Republican, what he said on Oprah, ...

I find it perfectly "justifiable" from numerous perspectives for someone to vote for a female candidate because she is a female.

Answer 9

That's insane. You should vote for or against someone based upon their platform alone.

Answer 10

I had the same question awhile ago.

No, I wont vote for her because I think she would make a bad president. It has nothing to do with us sharing the same genitals. When there is a female president worth voting for, I will vote for her. Until then, it's who is the lesser of the evil.