English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-30 04:30:23 · 6 answers · asked by rupert bear 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I had a friend and his dog staying for a w/end another friend called to see me with her 3 year old child my friends dog was outside in a shed where he is kept when he comes the child was outside also, I heard the dog growl
( I had never heard him growl) my friend told her child to leave the dog alonethen came in my other friend heard his dog growl again as he was in the garden and fetched the child in,bolting the stable door the child got out and must have been tourmenting the dog the dog warned him off but caught his lip (this dog is usually a softy) the child had to have stitches to his lip. I have recieved solicitors letters saying I am the keeper of the dog along with my friend and to forward my insurance details which I have ignored as the dog isn't mine I now have a letter saying I have breached protocol and they will take me to court where do I stand in this situation

2007-10-30 05:28:53 · update #1

6 answers

Protocols are like ethics -- they are the internal rules of an organization or department.

A breach of those protocols is when someone doesn't follow the rules -- but not seriously enough to also be a breach of the relevant laws.

2007-10-30 04:35:32 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 0

What Is Meaning Of Breach

2016-12-12 08:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by pavoni 4 · 0 0

It's a try-on, they know it and you know it. "Breach of protocol" doesn't mean a thing in this case. Protocol just means the way things are done, breaching it means behaving in a different way from that. It means nothing in law. I'd have a quick word with a solicitor, most will give you the initial interview free.

2007-10-30 07:36:54 · answer #3 · answered by champer 7 · 0 0

All county court proceedings now have protocols. This is disclosure of information by both parties to each other in order for the case to be heard quicker in the coourt.....basically it means the court would rather parties tried to settle disputes before it reached them

So when the solicitor asked you for information.....you should have given it ....or told them that it didnt apply to you. The refusal to provide anything requested by the opposition will go against you in the court room

2007-10-30 10:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by stormydays 5 · 0 0

protocol

2014-10-18 04:47:37 · answer #5 · answered by DAndrea 1 · 0 0

Basically "You didn't behave the way you were expected to".

2007-10-30 04:42:27 · answer #6 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers