Hillary's negative is the fact that she is a woman. Women secretly hate voting for women. Men want to keep their power. Men think women are only good for making babies, being emotional and not ruling on logic, and being on playboy covers but not good enough to be a leader.
Hillary is no worse than the other candidates, yet she gets picked on more because of the fact that she's a woman.
2007-10-30 03:53:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
When trying to sound forceful, she comes across as shrill.
She has an albatross around here neck named Bill.
She is a Socialist.
She admits she is going to raise taxes across the board.
Although some want government controlled health care, just as many see it as a complete disaster in the making.
She is disliked by as many, if not more, than those that like her.
After just 1 complet term in the Senate and no other elected office of any kind ever held, she seriously lacks gravitas.
When White Water is finally brought into the campaign, her "Smartest Woman in America" title will come out a bit tarnished.
Too many simply do not trust her.
After only 1 complete term in the only elected office she has ever held, she seriously lacks gravitas.
2007-10-30 07:12:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"doc" is a typical numbnuts Clinton slanderer.
Look at his "facts":
He says:
Defended the Black Panthers
That's a crime? Wasn't it JFK who said "Any country who cannot give legal rights to its worst citizens will never protect its best ones"
-- Supported the ACLU
Oh gee, as if DOC even knows that the ACLU does, like the horror of defending the Constitution. Doc should kiss the ACLU's butt every morning.
-- HMO
???
-- Whitewater
$40 million dollars in investigations revealed----NO CRIME
-- Vince Foster
Preposterous nonsense---slander.
-- Promotes an Anti-American socialist agenda
What the F does THAT mean? An anti-Bush agenda is what it means.
-- Has never worked an honest day in her life
Slander, more nonsense.
Should I keep going? There are not enough hours in a day.
Not enough hours in a day for DOC to spew his lies and demonstrate his ignorance.
Typical know-nothing GOP castrated rat.
2007-10-30 05:41:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
She has never successfully led anything in her life.
She's never run a business, she's never run a town, she's never run a state.
There's a huge difference between being a Senator and one of 100 votes and being the key person in charge.
When she tried leading the health care initiative under her husband's administration, it was a complete disaster.
She has not demonstrated solid leadership skills.
She has not successfully delivered results.
She cannot clearly articulate a vision, develop a realistic plan for achieving that vision and rally people behind her plan.
She doesn't inspire confidence in others regarding her abilities.
2007-10-30 03:56:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by S C 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No business experience.
No financial experience (except for the crooked Whitewater deal).
No military experience.
No executive experience.
No leadership experience.
Prone to being shrill and whining.
Makes frequent hyperbolic statements.
Regularly flip-flops on political issues.
Stood by a husband who cheated on her with at least 6 different women.
The only job she ever had was as an ambulance chaser. Unless you count being Bill's consort a job (professional wife) - it sure isn't a marriage.
Travelgate
Vince Foster
2007-10-30 04:42:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by pypers_son 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
--Selling influence to China. She has been caught twice.
--Supporting NAFTA and something called NAU which is the wholesale giving away of Americas treasures and riches to Mexico.
--She is a socialist and makes no effort to hide it if you actually listen to what she says consistently. If you are not in the lower 2% of our population socialism would be bad for you.
--She is dishonest. Just listen to her day after day contradict something she said emphatically the day before. She LIES. Do you want another liar for president? (to those who say she is much better than Bush I resopond 'She is not running against Bush!' but I do agree she IS a better liar.)
--She is a Clinton.
--She had her criminal records sealed until after the election. I wonder what she is hiding? But the fact that it is her CRIMINAL record ought to tell us something.
--She is a carpetbagger.
--She was a total failure in her promise to have universal healthcare "within 90 days of (her husband) taking office". It has been 15 years and nothing!
2007-10-30 03:49:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Noone can make the case because she has socialist beliefs. To those above who declare she isn't because of this or that reason, one would not might want to settle for each socialist coverage to be socialist.
2016-10-23 03:55:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by galustian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well follow this link and see what she did with Stan Lee and Ron Paul. Its a fact and processing it way though court now!
2007-10-30 03:48:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
-- Defended the Black Panthers
-- Supported the ACLU
-- HMO
-- Whitewater
-- Vince Foster
-- Promotes an Anti-American socialist agenda
-- Has never worked an honest day in her life
Should I keep going? There are not enough hours in a day.
2007-10-30 03:47:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Doc 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
She already served 8 years
2007-10-30 03:48:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scott B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋