2007-10-30 03:25:48 · 18 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Because he didn't have the gumption to take the political fallout that would have come if he'd told the generals to do what they have to in order to win the war.
2007-10-30 03:30:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Bush never had control over his presidency, or the archetecture of this quagmire that is Bush's war,
He will be left holding the bag for his neocon master's actions. Too dimwitted to understand exactly what he has wrought, managed by Cheney and David Addington from the Office of Legal Council, Bush is a pathetic example of an incompetant figurehead controlled by others.
He will drape an American flag accross his shoulders as if it were an ermine cape and let the Supreme Court crown him a monarch in being, but the REAL power is wielded behind the scenes by others who are not to be held accountable for their geo political schemes to privatize Middle Eastern oil fields. This is about empire.
This war was never meant to be won. The spice must flow.
2007-10-30 03:45:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush knew in the past he went in that there have been no WMDs, that Iraq had had no longer something to do with 9/eleven, and that Al Qaeda grew to become into quite often in Afghanistan and Pakistan, no longer Iraq. He had to end what his father had began and get Saddam Hussein. He duped the yankee human beings into believing that attacking Iraq could by some ability shop u . s . a . secure. Obama could are transforming into out of there years in the past, and we could continuously get out of Afghanistan, too. i'm advantageous the President knows this, yet i'm additionally advantageous he would not elect to be accused of being delicate on terrorism by using the astounding. He needs to end attempting to assuage them; they're going to by no ability consider something he does, besides.
2016-11-09 20:32:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Technically the war was won several years ago. The USA is there now to stop the civil wars and the fighting anti American section of the population .Then the USA and it's rulers will install a puppet Iraqi president and have full control over the country and will never leave .
2007-10-30 04:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by Kira 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush didn't chose the lose the war, the Democrats made that decision.
2007-10-30 14:52:59 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The longer the war lasts, the longer oil prices stay high and the more of our tax dollars he gets to syphon off for Haliburton. Plus, if he can get enough soldiers killed then he can boast about being a "War President" for a big war rather than a little dinky war. He still needs to boost the body count.
2007-10-30 03:58:12 · answer #6 · answered by buffytou 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He didn't chose to lose it, we just entered in the middle of a civil war where we didn't have the chance to win, wars faught for the wrong reasons never turn good. He didn't chose to lose the war, the circumstances we were under lost the war
2007-10-30 03:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by jm 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Give GWB and a Monkey a computer and in an infinite amount of time they will together win the Iraq War and write a extensive history of the world.
2007-10-30 03:39:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
The real goal is the Zionist plan to Balkanize the middle east -there is evidence that the sectarian attacks and bombings were carried out by the secrets servvices and special forces of the occupiers and by The Mossad.
2007-10-30 03:41:01 · answer #9 · answered by John M 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Huh? We won it in 6 weeks. We are currently policing Iraq until the Iraqi Government can do it themselves.
2007-10-30 03:29:53 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because killing the people that funded 9/11 would've been by attacking Saudi Arabia and we'd all be peddling to work right now.
2007-10-30 03:29:46 · answer #11 · answered by ryan c 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋