IE; one can become a victim of violent crime?
2007-10-29 18:41:25 · 19 answers · asked by macmanf4j 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Is it South Africa ? or Colombia ?
Argentina, Brazil, USA, Pakistan.
2007-10-29 19:29:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You can become the victim of a violent crime any where and at any time. It matters not if you are in an industrial country. If a person is determined to hurt someone, they will get it done. With a gun, a knife, club, car or bugs bunny dropping a safe on your head. It will happen.
If you feel safe where you live, great. I feel safe in KS. We have all types of violent crime. I think what you should look at is the concentration of population rather than a nation as a whole. Cities have more crime per capita than rural areas.
2007-10-29 19:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by hensleyclaw 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without doing any research I would say...
as for violent crime it would be America.
As for industrial and chemical exposure that can cause death disease and birth defects I would say China, but there will be no data to prove anything coming out of China.
America has more violent crime but China has more pollution all around. They have it in the air, rivers and streams extremely bad. The country does not have programs that protect the people from things such as dangerous working conditions, pollution and child labor.
If I had to pick a place to live knowing all of this it would have to be the USA. At least here we have the illusion of being free and clean water to drink.
2007-10-29 20:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by letfreedomring 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The poster about Japan is wrong -that is probably the lest violent industrial country. Women can and do go out anywhere anytime alone.
Might have something to do with handguns being taken away after WWII.
And a highly homogeneous and relatively prosperous population that pays high attention to "fitting in".
2007-10-30 03:45:30 · answer #4 · answered by Barry C 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This "Jihad from the west" which you communicate approximately could no longer be considered freedom from the west? possibly, who's conscious of. i'm a western Muslim, an American born convert to Islam, so i'm no longer taken heavily in any case. P.S. Hamas became elected democratically same as any election for loose human beings interior the west yet they at the instant are not even regarded as a central authority by ability of international places like my very own loose united states, the united states of a. fairly thrilling while different international places won't understand a democratically elected government, would not precisely help your west = freedom argument does it?
2016-10-03 00:16:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a relative aspect.All country,whether industrial or otherwise have their own safe and dangerous aspects associated with them.One cannot genaralise.In case you consider Nigeria,Afghanistan,Iraq,Sudan,Thailand,Iran,the (list is endless) anywhere near industrialisation then these countries are most DANGEROUS.As regards other industrialised countries,it is as I stated earlier.For an Indian,Germany may be more dangerous but for other ethnic groups it may be most peaceful.Its relative.Isnt it ?
2007-10-29 22:42:55 · answer #6 · answered by MrKnow_All 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
South Africa.
#1 Assaults per capita
#1 Rape per capita
#1 Manslaughters per capita
#2 Murder per capita
#4 Robberies per capita
#8 Kidnappings per capita
They've got some pretty tight gun control laws there, though, so it's probably a pretty safe place.
2007-10-29 21:40:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
America.
The Phillipines for violent crimes but it is not an industrialised country.
2007-10-30 04:42:53 · answer #8 · answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Harlem, Bed-Stuy, or the South Bronx.
2007-10-30 03:57:39 · answer #9 · answered by nickyboy666 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A foreign one
2007-10-29 20:33:29 · answer #10 · answered by Regwah 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋