It's one of the most savage acts you could do to a baby to subvert it to evil.
2007-10-29 16:12:45 · 22 answers · asked by The President 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I thank my mother everyday for sparing me from this wicked judeocult practice.
2007-10-29 16:19:26 · update #1
Never??????
2007-10-29 16:26:10 · update #2
Good Point. It actually severs and deadens the nerves and such. Plus it can get infected in a diaper with feces and urine too..
Plus with my ex, they did it wrong, and onw side was still attached...I know it must have been rough on him though..and the doctor said all he had to do was "Work" with it to make it better. though he said it hurt and bled at times...
Now my current boyfriend wasn't circumcised and he is glad with his mom's decision. All he had to do was keep it clean(like any genital area) and there IS a difference between sexual pleasure too, for the man, and the woman(circumsised doesn't feel right)
2007-10-29 16:20:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
mark of the beast
was
the
marks that branded you into the Roman Legions.
IVXLCD
the roman numerals
added up to 666, the numbers of the beast that was the roman empire at the time of Jesus.
number of the beast was mistranslated.
it was a pural form of the word number
the second beast that wanted to be worshipped like the first beast was the Holy Roman Empire (the second beast)
both beasts fell as bible Revelation predicted.
God the Son of the times new roman font LORD'S GODDESS, saw this as the hidden meanings in the bible.
the bible compiled version happened after the fall of the first Roman Empire, thus even knowledge of the second beast, the Holy Roman Empire was known when the bible was compiled. Perhaps the letters of the Gospel were not actually written verbatium by the freinds of Jesus, they would have been long dead before Constantine and society finished the bible as it came to be written.
this came to me in a vision.
just kidding it just seems obvious.
2007-10-29 23:27:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't satisfy the criteria given to John of Patmos. For starters, Society's dive into apostasis (2 Thessalonians 2:3) is still in progress, so the exposure of the son of Perdition (Ibid.; Revelation 13:1) is yet future. The state of the electronics art is approaching the point where the mark of Revelation 13:16ff would be feasible; microchip capsules are already being used in the veterinary field.
Circumcision was part of the terms of a covenant between the Sovereign LORD of Hosts and Av-Raham (Genesis 17:1-14); it was reiterated elsewhere in the Law and Prophets.
2007-10-29 23:48:59 · answer #3 · answered by B. C. Schmerker 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm not actually sure what the deal w/ the mark of the beast is, but I agree, circumcision is EVIL! I could see it having a purpose back in the day when you couldn't wash regularly, but now it's just cruel. And people don't even think about it!
2007-10-29 23:23:55 · answer #4 · answered by rorybuns 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Great question. Too bad I have the mark of the beast. I do have a rather nice member but I often wonder about having an uncircumcised member.
2007-10-29 23:38:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Proud to admit that I have never seen the "mark of the beast."
In other words, I am not eligible to answer this q.
But a good q!!!!lol
Edit:
your mother is a wise lady)
2007-10-29 23:18:19 · answer #6 · answered by Page 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe it to be a mark of the beast. However it is very possible that it may have ties to an ancient Kabbalistic blood sacrifice and ritual for aims unknown.
2007-10-30 20:42:52 · answer #7 · answered by tis_bernie 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
no! how do you circumsise a woman?? this was a practice in the old covenant! there is a circumcision that is not done by hands but by his spirit! god says he will burn his law on the table of mens hearts! jesus fullfilled the law! there is nothing you can do to earn the kingdom! love is his law!
2007-10-30 00:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by forsonclan03@yahoo.com 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ouch!
So unnatural.
Your God put it there for a reason.
How would that subvert a baby to evil?
2007-10-29 23:32:34 · answer #9 · answered by mw 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's the forehead that Revelation was talking about the mark showing up on...
Although it would add a new 'twist' to the right hand...
2007-10-29 23:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by SDW 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋