Truth or lies?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071028/ap_on_go_ot/us_iran;_ylt=AifwaH2PyOhnwtVf16lpI_WyFz4D
On this site, the UN is saying there is no evidence...I hear a lot of things from our president that Iran is making bombs...With Bush's track record on lack of WMD's, what does the world think?...I'm pretty sure 1/2 of Americans have some doubts on invading Iran as well as Iran actually developing nukes...why would Bush want to start a war with Iran if the weapons are not there? I ask this thinking we don't need their oil. Is it a way to remove a threat to Iraq and the Strait? What possible benefits to invading Iran? I ask this honestly.

I said Bush's track record for WMD's in general

It's Ford PREFECT, not PERFECT..you know like from the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

Answer 1

War should never ever be used for benefit, soldiers aren't little toys used to invade countries to make profit. Even though that seems to what were being used for now, it doesn't make it right. There is never benefit from death so that answers that question.

The reason we would attack Iran is to protect israel from being bombed to hell. Iran has dreams of destroying israel. If we ever did invade iran it would be in protection of israel. But in the end there will only be more death and more hatred.

Republican war mongers need to be removed from office and begin trying to give iran incentives to stray form the war path. But in the end invading Iran without approval from the UN will only incite a major war. China would realize that the US forces are so thin they could easily take Taiwan without consequence, and russia would send troops and weapons to iran in secret. We would have no countries helping us and that war we would be alone and over whelmed. America is no longer the top man in industry and war fare, other countries are catching up and diplomacy must always be an option. And war only in defense.

Answer 2

It is the old saying.. " fooled me once, will not fool me twice." or " cry wolf" There is nothing in this world that will make me believe Bush again.. if someone credible says that we must attack Iran.. then perhaps we should.. but I will not take Bush's word for anything again.

God only knows why he wants to attack Iran.. and what army is he using I wonder. Perhaps the government workers who were forced to go to Iraq will be the next group in Bush's army now that he has used up our National Guard.

No.. I say if he wants another war.. then no one should go unless he leads the charge.. him and Cheney , since they think they know so much about war.

Answer 3

Once and for all retards, Bush DID NOT say anything Clinton "Slilck Willy" said along with most democrats WE KNOW Iraq DID have WMD and we went in to find out what and where it was, as it is because Saddam knew Bush would keep his word and go in, he got rid of what he had.

The question people should be asking is, WHERE is it now, not keep coming out with this childish "he lied bullshit" you have to be retarded to think being told we have to go in and prevent WMDs from being used by Saddam or falling into the wrong hands./

Question to all the retards, where do you think the WMD would be now IF we had not gone in, and had we not gone in Saddam would have a LOT more by now.

Answer 4

Bush and the rest of the UN want to control Iran because it's one of the last true Sovereign States left. They are seen as an uncontrollable piece in their ultimate goal in the New World Order agenda.

Answer 5

Drop the perfect from the name and try something other than yahoo news

Answer 6

That Hitler of Iran admitted they were on the path and were unstoppable from getting them...good enough..."bomb Iran and bring the boys home"...

Answer 7

Iran says they are building nukes. Who would know better than them?

Answer 8

no, bush never said that and no one is going to invade iran. the news is just trying to scare people into voting for hilary. pay it no attention.
its just another lib-fib scare tactic.