what are the pros and cons? is there really a difference in smell
2007-10-29
13:23:37
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Warren Fitz Kennedy
2
in
Health
➔ Other - Health
we have to write a paper for sociology class about misconceptions of old rituals..and i got assigned circumcision, and i am circumcised, and a straight male, so I do not have a slightest idea what being uncircumcised is like and what it is like for a woman. All i know is that some of my female friends said its "nasty to blow uncut guys" any input is helpful. thanks
2007-10-29
13:26:40 ·
update #1
Usually because it's what they're used to. This only really happens in the US, or Muslim and Jewish faiths, where they're used to circumcision. In many other cultures where circumcision is rare or odd, like Europe, Scandinavia, New Zealand, there is no such problem with a normal penis.
I've never been with a cut guy, only uncut, and so far never experienced a bad smell or taste or smegma or anything. If the guy washes then that's not gonna happen. And I wouldn't do it with a cut guy who didn't wash! So I would say it more depends on the individual.
Your female friends are probably either going on what they heard from others, going on myths, or an experience which they went into determined not to like. It seems a common attitude over in the US.
There is a lot more you can do for oral with the foreskin compared to without. I think perhaps some girls prefer without because they're scared it'll be too difficult, and the glans is too moist, I dunno.
During sex most girls probably wouldn't notice/feel the difference especially not with condom but there is a lot of evidence that uncircumcised provides more pleasure during sex, here is an interesting link: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com
You might like to ask this in Men's Health, might get more answers.
Good luck with your work.
2007-10-29 14:26:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think it's more of a cultural thing. Most American males are circumcised so more women prefer men who are like that. That's because they're more used to seeing a circumcised male than uncircumcised one. In other parts of the world, like in Europe, where this procedure is seldom done, the women prefer uncircumcised men. As for cleanliness, an uncircumcised man who bathes regularly is cleaner than a circumcised man who doesn't. I don't really know why some men seem to think that being circumcised is an excuse for them not to clean themselves there.
2007-10-29 20:37:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by RoVale 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Here is some exclusive information that you can present in your report:
Yes, an uncirc penis is more likely to have an odor (whether a person finds it objectionable is subjective). It happens because the foreskin is mucous membrane, not skin. Mucous membrane is more porous so odorous substances from the foods you eat can be secreted by the inner foreskin and then stay covered up under the outer foreskin. However, this is no different from what happens to a woman's vulval lips.
Here is an amazing discovery that eliminates uncirc penis odor, so a woman can have oral sex with an uncirc penis and it will be odor free: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/faq.html#odorsolution
Also, here are the results of a survey done with woman who were sexually experienced with both circ and uncirc men and what they noticed on the differences between the two kinds of sex:
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/1hook_scrapes.html
Here is why a natural (uncirc) penis is better for the man:
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Function.html
Most women who say they like circ'd, it's because they think it's cleaner. But once they learn the simple cleaning tip above, that excuse is null.
Also, when women say they don't notice a difference, it's usually because they've had limited experience with uncirc. and also, it may not be the way the penis feels inside the vagina that's different, but instead, it's the way the man thrusts. Natural men thrust gentler, and they use a consistent rhythm that is more likely to bring a woman to orgasm. This is all explained in the links below:
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/6bangaway_thrusting.html
http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/8out_of_sync.html
.
2007-11-02 15:06:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by mayisay 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
Mostly because that's what we're used to. It's also easier for Oral Sex as you don't have to keep holding the skin back. Not a big deal though I do prefer that a guy is.
2007-11-02 18:17:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mary H 2
·
6⤊
0⤋
I live in the good old Australian outback....
haha not really, and no i dont ride to work in a kangaroo...
Very few if any Aussie men get circumcised, its just whats expected. Only for medical reasons really.
Theres no difference, if both kept clean.
Just people are used to i suppose
2007-10-31 08:44:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Here in Colombia in general the mans do not circimcised because is considerated minus man your understand me, only is good this option when there are sexual sickness, the infections. But I do not believe the womans preferer the circumcised man. But in this world all is possible all is possible. Je je je je. Bye and good luck.
2007-10-30 18:04:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by elkinpi17 2
·
1⤊
4⤋