Flowers are traditional, but it's your wedding and therefore your decision. If you enjoy them, it's not a waste; if you find them distracting or distasteful, then yes, for you they would be a waste.
If you like the look but not the smell, many florists can come up with ingenious bouquets that provide color without aggravating your allergies or delicate sense of smell.
Or you could consider a very limited use of flowers - maybe just the bouquets. The centerpieces could be anything that complements your theme - my friend used tall fluted vases filled with orange slices for a visually striking but allergy-free alternative. You could easily skip flowers at the church, or replace them with ribbons and bows.
2007-10-29 06:09:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by teresathegreat 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Well me personally I think the real flowers are a waste of money. We have already brought our silk flowers (LOL) and our wedding is in May 2008. We purchased them already because I saw exactly what I want and the bouquets were only $1, yes $1 a piece, of course I purchased 10, 2 for each girl so they can look full and at the place where I went they had all the accessories and the exact color I needed to make the boutonnieres for the guys, parents and put a few things around the table. All together I spent $35 compared to what the florist was charging me. ($200 for silk flowers and $300 for real flowers)
2007-10-29 14:06:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by OFFICIALLY MRS. HOWARD! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If flowers gives you a headache, then the question of having flowers is not a question of waste, but of comfort for you. I don't know where you're getting married, so I can't make a lot of suggestions. You might be able to get away with just candles - depends on your location. Just don't do fake flowers. I know a lot of people on this board loves them, but they're not that nice looking and the ones that are nice looking are about the same cost as real flowers. Besides, what do you do with them after the wedding? They're hard to resell.
I personally love real flowers, but then again the smell doesn't give me a headache. We are getting married in a location that doesn't require lots of flowers, so we're just using them to decorate the chuppah and the centerpieces will be a few tulips submerged in water. I get them wholesale so the prices are low.
2007-10-29 14:05:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Peace 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I actually just posted a link about this on my blog. I kind of shunned the flower idea at first, but ended up going with a mixture of silk and real (but not overkill of either). I wanted real flowers for the bouquets and corsages, etc. We used mostly orchids which didn't have a strong smell at all. All the silk flowers were used for the decoration of the ceremony and centerpieces. One neat alternative to flowers is to use paper lanterns or bubbles if it is an outdoor ceremony. We had a bubble machine set up and everyone loved it! It gave a fairy tale feel that flowers couldn't quite match.
2007-11-01 23:19:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by sunsetdawn335 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi, well you can do what you want!!
Personally, I LOVE REAL FLOWERS! They are very elegant. If you don't like the real ones, you can use silks, but I can spot a silk flower from a mile away. Then, what do you do with all those silk arrangements? They sit and collect dust most of the time. I would rather have 1 or 2 roses in a bud vase....not a huge arrangement of 67 different kinds of silks!
Now...you can certainly opt NOT to have flowers....But what will you carry going down the aisle? You will want to carry something!
I also love candles at weddings, and you can do so many nice centerpieces with candles.
There is no saying you HAVE to have flowers, but personally, I love them! That's my two-cents.
2007-10-29 22:29:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by iloveweddings 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My groom absolutely hates fake flowers, so we're getting real ones. However, we're not getting many. We'll have two tall, thin arrangements to frame the area where the officiant and we will stand, and we're making small, simple centerpieces for each table. The centerpieces will consist of red roses in small, round bowl-shaped vases. We can buy all the roses for under $150, and each arrangement will be abot $100. I'm making my bouquet myself, so all I have to buy are a few flowers and some ribbon.
If you don't want flowers, green plants such as ferns and ivy are a good alternative. You can also decorate with lamps and candles.
2007-10-29 13:34:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by SE 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They give me a headache too, plus they are so expensive! I had a small (25 people) country wedding, so my compromise was in keeping with the event.
The church was decorated only with bows on the front pews.
I made bouquet of garden flowers that basically have no scent (zinnias, daisies, ivy). We didn't bother with corsages or the like. I used mums from a garden center to decorate the church hall - we repotted the individual plants in decorative containers and had people take them home for their own gardens. I did take hayfever medicine that day, not so much to protect against the flowers, but to protect against the evil perfume that I knew a few guests would wear.
2007-10-29 13:18:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by phiguru 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I was thinking I wanted flowers too but since they are very expensive I read this other idea for hershey kiss roses and opted for that instead. Check out this page. It comes with instructions on how to create a bouquet of candy flowers. Very beautiful. Great party favor too!
There is nothing wrong with having no flowers. I have read questions where brides to be want a substitute for wedding cake. People suggest cheese cake instead of traditional. There's nothing wrong that picking something out of the ordinary.
2007-10-29 17:18:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hannah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I used a mixture of dried and silk flowers for some. Other's I am just using fruit (it ties back to our theme)
People have allergies to flowers, we are getting married during the cold months so they aren't really that available, and as you said....I've been to too many where it just reeks!
Plus, they'll be dead before the honeymoon is over. With dried/silks I saved at least a grand because I shopped seasonal sales and used coupons. I'll also be getting half my money back re'selling them if not more. Live florals would have cost us about 5k. These ran about $1,000.
My boquets are real though. I wanted to be a snob about that one thing and didn't want to attempt with live flowers the day before and end up in tradgedy.
2007-10-29 15:06:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by pspoptart 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think if flowers give you a headache you definitely shouldn't have them at your wedding.
We are not going crazy with flowers at our wedding, basically just small bouquets for myself and the girls and boutonnieres for my fiance and his groomsmen. We aren't doing any decorating because the place we are getting married at already has flowers planted there, any more would be too much.
Personally the only kind of flowers I don't like are ones in huge centerpieces that are so wide and high you can't see half the people at the table.
2007-10-29 13:10:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋