2007-10-29 06:01:01 · 8 answers · asked by life_is_insane 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
This is untrue. The difference between the two is duration and conditioning. With love, it lasts without an expiration. You see a person's flaws and love them for it. You see a person's beauty, their insecurities and past mistakes and nothing alters you from this feeling. With Lust [infatuation], it is based on outer appearance and sudden feelings. It is sparked by animal attraction and stimulation but eventually dies unless based on more than its origin.
Love is rare and hard to find. Lust is right around the corner.
Hope this helps.
2007-10-29 06:06:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well i'd say It's impossible for love to exist without lust (talking about a adult relationship.) but it is perfectly possible for lust to exist without love.
But Love does Exist ... and it's a wonderful feeling.
2007-10-29 13:05:18 · answer #2 · answered by raywillshout 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not true. You can have love, you can have lust, and then you can have the best - love and lust. I completely lust over my love....
2007-10-29 13:04:35 · answer #3 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is both. Generally lust comes first.
2007-10-29 13:03:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust is a desire. It connects the lower chakra: sacral, base.
Love is a verb. It connects hearts.
2007-10-29 13:07:12 · answer #5 · answered by bfreefromstress 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is not true at all. Two very intense feelings, but worlds apart.
2007-10-29 13:04:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is such thing...
you juss gotta fint the right person.
2007-10-29 13:03:56 · answer #7 · answered by Fany 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not true, why would you think that ?
2007-10-29 13:11:08 · answer #8 · answered by X~xQuestions&&Answersx~X 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋