I have been writing my congressmen, senators, mayor, govenor, city council and county officials, every week about immigration.
Good for you too! Keep up the good work!
2007-10-29 06:59:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
For once and for all we need to as a country decide if those that come to our country illegally should be dealt with within our existing laws, and that means that we use the same procures at the border, which is sending them back right away, we need to do in the interior as well. I find it amazing that that when cities and towns such as Hazelton Pa try to pass city ordinances that deal with the illegals, the ACLU and such win law suits on the grounds only the feds and enforce and make immigration laws, but when states such as NY, wants to grants drivers licenses to the illegals all of a sudden the feds have no interest in the granting of rights to the illegals. As to if we need illegals for our work force, it is just about private profit at public cost.
2007-10-28 16:57:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by jean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The motive of NY Governor in allowing ILLEGALS get drivers licenses has a gimmick. If you read the latest pronouncement of DHS Chief Chertoff, he just could not stop it since it belonged to the State, not a Federal one.
BUT, it is one way of really identifying BAD ILLEGALS against GOOD ILLEGALS. I agree with you that Webster still term ILLEGALS as ILLEGALS, no matter what. Maybe the interpretation of the NY Governor is to help out the Federal database for names, addresses, workplaces, ethnicity, and everything like a dossier of either person or interest or suspects. It will be a criss cross for ALL ILLEGALS to submit every angle of their identification in the forms to fill out without being charged with an invasion of privacy.
I remember that during Pres. Marcos time in the PHilippines, there was a rampant array of unlicensed firearms that are locally made and are instruments of specific murder cases. He made a sort of gimmick that all unlicensed firearms may be surrendered without the fear of repercussion, or arrest, or even forensic data. BUT, those surrendering are required to fill out a form that identifies them en toto.
He was able to identify who is who, and how is how.
Same thing here buddy.
2007-10-28 16:44:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joey G 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Californians recalled Gray Davis (former gov of California) for trying to do just exact ally what is going on in NY back in 2003, and low and behold we have the governator now.
Get organized and try to recall your governor, chances are the majority in your state does not want this initiative to pass. Send a message that this is not acceptable.
2007-10-28 16:34:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ancient Warrior DogueDe Bordeaux 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
What do you assume? Senator Dick, I honestly have a Dream, Durbin invited unlawful extraterrestrial beings to testify contained in the Capitol. Is it any ask your self that they march in our streets? Tom Tancredo referred to as ICE and requested them to arrest them pointing out: "I call on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement corporation to detain any unlawful extraterrestrial beings at this press convention," stated Tancredo, who claims to have alerted federal authorities about the nicely publicized press confrence. "in simple terms because those unlawful extraterrestrial beings are getting used for political benefit doesn’t recommend they get immunity from the regulation. If we may be able to’t implement our guidelines contained in the construction the position American guidelines are made, the position can we implement them?” i imagine we are previous calling our Senators. i imagine we go with to commence circulating petitions to bear in mind them in the previous they could do any more suitable damage. we go with to get this message out in the previous, God Forbid, Hillary receives elected. The liberal press has already elected her. who do you imagine Hillary's $5,000.00 in preserving with infant is going to benefit? Do you imagine that ought to were stated by her marketing campaign manager who's a previous president of l. a. Raza? it truly is amazingly sparkling that it really is the Dems who've blocked any type of immigration reform. 2 years in the past the Republicans exceeded HR 4437, the enforcement in simple terms bill. Polls indicated the yank human beings favourite that bill 2 to at least a million. The Dems felt that you could't have enforcement without amnesty. 2 thoroughly unrelated topics yet liberal good judgment nontheless. the in simple terms element the Dems have shown to that end far is that you may have amnesty without enforcement. 3 million in 86 and 20 million now. Time to question all of them and commence over.
2016-10-23 03:12:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would an illegal want a drivers licence anyway? Most of them already have feak or stolen ID. I really dont think they would want to be accounted for ,do you?
2007-10-28 16:42:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What are you going to do when you get into a crash and the other car is driven by an illegal immigrant? Wouldn't you rather he had insurance?
Sometimes you have to think practically rather than philosophically.
And the fact that you wrote to the president and your congressmen indicates your basic lack of knowledge of this issue (state vs. federal).
2007-10-28 17:21:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
Cheers to you! I agree 100%!
SPEAK UP UNITED STATES!!
*United we stand*
2007-10-28 16:34:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by notgrannysmith 3
·
7⤊
1⤋
just that???give driver license to illegal aliens? lol
they can put "Undocumented or illegal aliens" in their driver license.. is this good idea?
2007-10-28 16:47:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by o_o 4
·
0⤊
2⤋