Wouldn't it be fantastic if every child, not just one, that has been taken was revealed safe and sound.
2007-10-28 07:47:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mancloud 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
God bless Madeline, and I pray that wherever she is, she is happy and healthy. However....there are CONSEQUENCES when we neglect to do what God has charged us to do, in this case to care for a human being.
God gave this couple a beautiful daughter....and what did they do? They thought that it might be a good idea to leave THREE children under 3 years of age ALONE (when the 3 year old had a history of sleepwalking) while they went out to eat????????
Maybe that's what we should be asking. Or some of the questions below.....
"1) Will you and your friends take lie detectors tests? While not guaranteed, they are a decent barometer for an investigation's direction. If there is nothing to hide, releasing the results would be a public relations boon, and the investigation could center around Madeleine for a change.
2) What time was it when you discovered Madeleine was missing? Was it 9 p.m., as Kate states, or 10 p.m.? And why the discrepancy? How long did it take for you to call the police? There are reports of a significant delay on your part. You stated that the shutters were forced open, but the police and hotel staff said there was no evidence of tampering. And Kate, why, upon discovering that Madeleine was missing, did you return to the restaurant, leaving the two-year old twins alone (again) while a predator could still have been lurking nearby? Since the restaurant was only "twenty yards" away, your screaming clearly would have been heard. Interestingly, Kate, you yelled, "They've taken her," but how did you know Madeleine was abducted? After all, the doors were unlocked. Madeleine was known to sleepwalk. Or perhaps this little girl just happened to awaken in a dark, unfamiliar place, becomes scared and, alone and understandably frightened, looked for the comfort of her parents. When she didn't see either of you in the apartment, could she have walked outside to find you? And, by the way, Kate, why did you say "they" took her?
3) Your resort was extremely child-friendly. Why not use the inexpensive babysitting services that were available? Some reports state that you did not want the children to be around unfamiliar people. Yet the same people who ran the day camp your children attended were also the babysitters. Also, how could "strangers" be any worse than leaving three young children (with a combined age of seven) alone in an unlocked apartment?
4) Exactly how far away was the restaurant? There are huge inconsistencies with your answers to this question. Was it 50 yards, 150 or just 20, as Kate stated in an interview last week? Could you in fact see the room from your table? How often did one of you walk back to check on the children before Madeleine went missing: Every hour, half-hour, or not at all? (The statements of the resort staff differ markedly from yours.) If, as you say, this arrangement was so secure, and you could see your apartment from your table, wouldn't you have been able to see any alleged abductor? Isn't it true that your view of the room was partially blocked by a wall and a hedge, and that the other door to the room and the windows were not visible at all? Is this the "secure arrangement" you actually compared to eating in your backyard garden?
5) During a BBC interview, Kate, you were adamant that the children would not awaken during the time you and your husband were dining. Yet since Madeleine had a history of sleepwalking, how could you be so sure of this? Were the children given any sleeping drugs or medications?
6) How often did you dine out (at child-friendly restaurants) while leaving the children alone? What were the distances of these restaurants from your room?
7) Did you ever hire private investigators after Madeleine's disappearance? If not, why?
8) What is the nature of the Limited Company you established after Maddy vanished? How much money has been raised and spent? For what were the spent monies used? Has any reward from the company been posted? Are any family members on the payroll? What are the limitations, if any, on how the money can be spent?
9) Why did you travel to the United States when not one lead ever suggested that Madeleine was taken there? How much money did you raise in America?
10) You stated in an earlier interview: "Looking at it from where we are now, I don't feel we were irresponsible, I feel we are very responsible parents." Do you still feel that way?
These questions are, at a minimum, a logical starting point to get to the bottom of Madeleine's disappearance.
However, there is one point that I simply cannot rectify:
Assume for a minute that if the police dog was accurate in its detection of death in the room, and the death was that of Madeleine - and we all pray that it is not - then why would the perpetrator take a dead child from the room?"
2007-10-28 07:57:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by lady_phoenix39 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
If Madeline is ever found, the religious will say "thank God" and give Him the credit - even while another 1000 children remain unfound
2007-10-28 08:02:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by I'm an Atheist 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It very well could be that God has revealed to someone where poor little Madeline is. It's possible God didnt reveal it to a major news source. Do you understand how ridiculous your question is? I do have to give you atheists credit for coming up with new ways to express your contempt for people who believe in God. Do you sit up nights thinking of silly questions to ask?
2007-10-28 07:51:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by phlada64 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
God is in the heart, the heart is all knowing, sees all and hears all.
God is in many peoples hearts.
And I would say many people feel something about this case.
But science and politics has to go through a process to prove or disprove something.
God knows, and knows it knows.
Maybe science could listen to the heart more often, it may find "cures" for all sorts of things.
Should you not direct your question to the police, why haven't they found what has happened to Madeline.
To blame God for all and sundry is unknowing the nature of God.
2007-10-28 07:53:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Astro 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
What part of 'HELL' don't you understand? We don't begin to know the reasons but we still make the choices. If everyone chose NOT to bring children into this crazy world unless we could rid it of all evil, these situations wouldn't torment us as they do. Only in Hell are the little ones slaughtered and abused so mercilessly.
2007-10-28 08:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by midnite rainbow 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay
It's horrible what happened to Madeline, but what about the others who were kidnapped?
Anyway, you must turn toward him in time of need. He knows exactly where she is, if she is alive, what's happened/happening. I could go on and on but I'll probably run out of space, so any questions email me
2007-10-28 07:48:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tribe_belly 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because that god is myth dreamt up by some desert tribal leaders to keep their followers in check
2007-10-28 08:49:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maid Angela 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
satan is the ruler of this world right now. That's why bad things happen to good people and little children. People who hurt children do not follow God, but satan. There's two paths to go by, and only two paths, good and evil. God is the good one, not the evil one. Do not blame Him.
2007-10-28 07:50:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by byHisgrace 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
so I guess people want to be robots now.
next question will be...
If God is a loving God,
then why did he let this happen to _____.
People have free will.
2007-10-28 08:50:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by gary L 4
·
1⤊
0⤋