maybe if I did perhaps
but I didn't and apparently no one bothered to tell other writers at the time that it had happened
all you have is your religious book as evidence
2007-10-28 06:45:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Believe what? Your question is open ended. Would I believe he 'rose from the dead'?
Several years ago I technically died multiple times and yet here I am. I have documented medical evidence and living witnesses.
Have you taken in a magic show recently? Most magicians do better than that with no props at all. If I saw someone claiming to "rise from the dead" I would probably say 'David Blain could do it better.
This falls well into the category of the the old play on words. "I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it."
But don't walk away smugly thinking you've proved the tired old "no proof would convince the non believer". Because the fact is that if there is a god by the Christian definition then wouldn't he know what would convince anyone? I'm open to being convinced but no human could convince me. The proof of god would only be in god. So when he decides to convince me here I am. And I don't need to know what would convince me because if he shows up he will know.
2007-10-28 06:42:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Demetri w 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Just like a Christian asking questions that they think they're the only ones with the answer to.
I have an answer to your question though. Yes.
But that'll never happen.
Would you hold your breath until you stop relying on faith to prove your fairy tales? You can't, because you're weak and your opinions are half-felt. You'd exhale before even trying saying that god didn't want you to know right then. Who knows, if you hold your breath long enough you'll pass out and have a vision. Or maybe you'll just smack your head off a coffee table and knock some sense into that empty melon of yours. Have a great day, and good luck with the faith thing. Or lack thereof.
2007-10-28 06:40:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Agnostic Front 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
nicely, my answer will be round sixtieth yet perchance you'll nevertheless examine it. for my area, i don't believe of any of the gospel writers said Jesus upward thrust from the useless. it truly is a concept supported by many experts contained in the container. That instead, it change into the followers of likely Paul, or per chance distinct the earliest Christians that wrote down those debts. for my area, i imagine it really is had to seem on the very incontrovertible truth that Paul change into the first man or woman to position in writing about Jesus. That he change into the single which all started speaking about Jesus being the sacrifice for all guy-type and so on. observe that the gospels keep on with those letters from Paul, and that Paul is the guy who comes up with the concept Jesus is the son of guy, that the regulation is valueless and a penitentiary and that Jesus is a blood sacrifice for all peoples. i trust Jesus existed. That he change right into a danger to the Roman authorities because he claimed to be the Messiah. Which meant he threatened the reign of the present Roman ruler. And with all different Messiah claimants in the previous and after him, he change into crucified. i do not trust that they fabricated some thing out of malice. instead, they quite trust what they were taught by Paul and his church. there is a few exciting aspects about this available, alongside with who Paul fairly change into. in case you go with to carry close write me.
2016-10-23 02:43:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
first of all "according to Jesus Himself" is an assumption. Just because you attribute that (or any) verse to him does not make it so - nor does just saying so in a book constitute proof for anyone who does not accept that book as true.
that is called circular logic, my friend. To a non-Christian, it's the same as: "I believe everything Fred says; Fred never lies. I know this is true because Fred said so."
I myself do not know what Jesus looked like (certainly not like the image the Italian painters invented 1.5 millenia later), and I'm not a medical examiner or doctor, so I wouldn't necessarily know for sure if any corpse as presented was actually dead - Jesus or otherwise.
2007-10-28 06:44:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Believe what? If I saw a stage magician "rise from the dead" after being "dead" for three days, would I believe it was "real" - or an illusion?
If an illusionist like Criss Angel can pull off that trick (and I'm sure he could) would you still believe?
2007-10-28 06:49:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by 222 Sexy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I saw it with my own eyes and Jesus allowed me to take reasonable measures to rule out that it was a fake, then I probably would believe.
However, I'm not going to believe some second-hand account from a book because I know too well the huge human capacity for deluding themselves and others...
2007-10-28 06:40:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by crypto_the_unknown 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I can show you another book that's about 3,000 years old that describes someone rising from the dead. It's called the Epic of Hammurabi. If you personally saw him do that, would you believe?
2007-10-28 06:41:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Maybe, may not, You would need to prove to me that it is Jesus and not somebody elses. What if is was anther person rasied from the dead by a necromancer. Pro to me that is was jeasus Gods son and I would believe.
2007-10-28 06:41:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd believe that I was either trippin' out on some serious sh1t, dreaming, I turned into a mental case, a prank, or that zombies are taking over the world.
So yeah...I'd believe one of those things....why do you ask? And if this isn't the answer you were expecting, clarify on WHAT we'd believe....^_^
2007-10-28 06:39:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I've personally seen a guy produce a dove out of thin air, but I don't believe that really happened.
2007-10-28 06:40:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Al 4
·
3⤊
0⤋