If a law passed in the name of morality has immoral consequences, destroying the lives of those who made a youthful mistake, can the law truly be considered moral?
There are always unintended consequences and I think when we try to legislate from self-roughhouses we risk harm in ways that was never intended.
Christ taught that we will be judged on the same ground that we judge others. Isn’t this exactly what we risk when our laws make unreasonably harsh judgments that destroy lives?
2007-10-28
02:23:55
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
"I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice." -Abraham Lincoln
2007-10-28
02:38:04 ·
update #1
The answers so far show that you have no clue what I am talking about.
Do you think an 18-y-old’s life should be ruined forever because he/she honestly believed a 15-y-old was of an age of consent and they had one encounter which they both believed to be consensual?
In the name of morality, many apparently do believe that it is perfectly fine to destroy this young life by labeling him/her with a scarlet letter for the rest of their life.
2007-10-28
02:45:00 ·
update #2
Laws governing morality that lack compassion may create consequences that are at least as immoral as the acts they wish to stop.
There can be no justice without compassion.
2007-10-29
14:17:09 ·
update #3