English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The ones that get their girlfriends pregnant, and then just f*ck off, leaving her raising the child alone, and having to pay for everything when the man shoudl be supporting the family, not a woman just by herself.
And then lots of people in society say, oh he was too young, it's not his faultm he didn't know better. Did those women get themselves pregnant or something? He was smart enough to stick his dick in, why should he not be smart neough to stay around and at least be a parent? Why shoudl society ease up on people like that?

2007-10-27 21:04:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

9 answers

Let's face the facts real quick. Fathers have always been excused from being good dads. Mothers, however, do not have and/or want the "luxury."

2007-10-27 22:07:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

You are short on facts. Care to name a few of these boys who have been 'excused'?
.
Who decides what "a good dad" is? How about moms, are they excused from being a "good" mom? (they are, and more often).

If the mother chooses to track him, he is NEVER excused, period! There is no legal standing to just 'absolve' a man or boy from paternity issues, regardless his age or financial standing. Women on the other hand use these same reasons to allow women to kill their unborn children on a whim. Even young boys who are still in school and who were statutorily raped by older women have been ordered to pay child support. Nothing frees a man from paying the mother unless she chooses. He has no options, she has many.

No man or boy is responsible for any child born in the US today, they do not have that legal ability, only women have the right to make the decision that allows a child to be born.

See, the problem is that women (some) are demanding unilateral rights (that means 'choice for all made by one') while also demanding fathers have just as much responsibility as the woman chooses for him, from none to all.
Keep in mind that in regard to reproduction, women have at least 4 options that are unavailable to men under any circumstances AND he may not be aware there IS a child.

By the way, men don't "get" women pregnant. It is a shared effort whether intended by either or not, so in a way, yes, she did get herself pregnant, unless she wasn't there at the time, of course.

2007-10-28 02:14:29 · answer #2 · answered by Phil #3 5 · 3 1

Well maybe they were tricked into fatherhood by women that were supposedly "on the pill."

Maybe they didn't want to be fathers, but the woman didn't care about their wishes.

(Don't say "he should've used a condom." If she didn't want to be a mother in the first place, SHE should've taken more responsibility for HER body. Women are the ones that own the body that gets pregnant & yet somehow this translates into 50/50 responsibility with the man.

I wonder if that can be true about VDs. Is the woman 50/50 responsible for the doctor's bill if the man gets a venereal disease?)

Maybe these boys realize that women that haven't begun their lives yet & haven't established themselves in their careers have the LEGAL option of abortion. ...The only thing men can do is hide... hoping the woman won't track him down & FORCE him LEGALLY to pay for her decisions.

...& maybe some guys are just jerks that told the woman one thing & did another, leaving her alone. THAT type of guy that lied & then split isn't worth anything.

Point is... you don't know the situation behind these boy's decisions. Not all cases are "some jerk that split."

If women can have reasons to abort their children... men should be given the latitude to have reasons of their own.

2007-10-28 02:19:27 · answer #3 · answered by hopscotch 5 · 0 2

Did you ever think about teenage boys are prepared to be the dad and want the child, and then the girl goes and get's an abortion or leaves the child on the door step of some house. For your information, what i just said happens a f*ck load more than boys not taking responsibility!

2007-10-27 22:18:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

properly if she only presently broke up somebody, then she desires time to remember herself. some teenager ladies DO use that excuse, and confident, it incredibly is in many instances at instances to no longer harm the guy's emotions. yet remember that she desires time (she only have been given out of a courting!) to think of approximately transitioning from acquaintances to extra-than-acquaintances. it incredibly isn't any longer an common element to choose for on, so do no longer assume a speedy answer...somewhat from a woman as a results of fact they are lots extra gentle and emotional. If something, talk it out along with her, yet do no longer stress her. Do regardless of you could to get your suggestions and emotions out, yet on an identical time, pay attention to what she has to declare. good success!

2017-01-04 13:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I'm not sure how involved my step brother was in the raising of his son, yet I do know when he was around 14 he gor this girl pg; his daddy marched him to the courthouse made him sign a paper that said he's the daddy; meaning you're gonna be messing with the girls you're gonna take on a bit of resposibility of giving the kid your name. Perhaps he had to start paying support once he became an adult I have no idea.

2007-10-27 21:13:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You're right. They should be executed.

Actually, I didn't realize they were excused. I've only heard bad things about absentee fathers. Fathers in general, in fact. Hell, I didn't even know fathers existed. The TV told me that all men cheat, lie, and abandon their family. Naturally, I believed it because the TV doesn't lie.


Those teenage boys who impregnate a girl end up paying child support out of their Burger King check, become alcoholics, and commit suicide.

2007-10-27 23:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by Jinton 3 · 1 2

In the United States those women had complete control over reproduction. Women have full reproductive rights. If they chose to have a child out of wedlock - so they are responsible.

2007-10-27 23:09:50 · answer #8 · answered by Rio Madeira 3 · 2 2

Bottom line society is what it is, you can't change it, you can just choose which part you want to be in.

2007-10-27 21:22:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers