it seems that its all about the money, a friend of mine said that its prolly cheaper to create a new one than to fix the bugs on 360.
2007-10-27 23:39:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
What they forget is something which is very basic: "If it's not broken, don't fix it". Competition is fierce and I suppose in order for some company's to survive they have to at least "try to build a better mousetrap" or at least give the impression that they have improved a product when in fact, they have turned out an ineffective product. Then we have the matter of keeping the stockholders happy by having to giving out bigger and bigger dividends. That's done by spending more money by informing the Public and Stockholders that they have a bigger, better and cheaper product, when in fact it is not bigger, better or cheaper.
2007-10-28 01:01:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alfie333 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They start off with a passion for the product and then become big enough to go public. After going public the duty is not to the consumer or their own interest in producing a good product but to a legal obligation to produce a profit for the shareholders above all else.
2007-10-27 19:27:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew O 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Couldn't even guess. I am in search of the following:
L'oreal colour mousses, punk-style
Tommy Hilfiger cologne
Lou Lou perfume
Mr. Skinny low-fat noodles
Noca milk
Shiseido compact powder cream foundation
the good sour candies shaped like a lollipop
small jars of Tostito's medium salsa
low-salt Triscuits (available sometimes)
chicken livers
fontina cheese
2007-10-27 19:28:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i've got confidence the might desire to %. aside each and every thing because of fact there are errors there that forestall me from enjoying the product. I cant take exhilaration in it if the product is worsening or the reserving is incorrect or the cardboard isn't thrilling. i don't have the potential to take exhilaration in the product on the 2nd because of fact there are merely too many incorrect judgements and that i cant replace the channel because of fact i like professional wrestling. The hogan and Bischoff ruining TNA argument is something different, My emotions on that are they're making the incorrect judgements. they're doing the precise opposite of turning out to be and Hogan and Bischoff look extra prepared approximately attempting to re-do the previous than circulate on and take TNA forward. With the samoa Joe and AJ varieties ingredient you ought to understand that those 2 alongside with Kurt perspective are the final workers and the final attracts in TNA. Samoa Joe till these days with Jeff Jarret have been doing no longer something, he became kidnapped on a result coach than months later he decrease back without clarification approximately what occurred as though they only needed us to neglect approximately that perspective. they're leave out applying the huge attracts. no person is asserting placed them interior the identify photograph perpetually yet supply them a stable, long feud. what's AJ varieties doing different than being Ric Flairs lackey appropriate now. have interaction AJ in a software with somebody. boost this feud between Jeff Hardy and Mr. Anderson and Get RVD to paintings AJ. on the grounds that Bischoff and Hogan arrived,TNAs utilization of Samoa Joe is merely approximately comparable to how WCW used Bret Hart. WCW had something considerable in Bret Hart and that they thoroughly leave out used him and his abilities. TNA these days is doing the comparable with Joe and AJ.
2016-10-14 06:03:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually they get bought out by a corporation which cuts corners to save money and ends up ruining it.
2007-10-27 19:25:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think greed is the number one thing and they figure once you've switched over that a lot of the people won't go through the hassle of switching again!! It's truly despicable!!
2007-10-27 19:28:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ginny 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hate that,especially restaurants.The first month of opening the portions are huge,the price is right and the food is delicious.Then just when you make it your usual spot they jack up the price and skimp on the quantity as well as quality.
2007-10-27 19:34:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by MISS K.I.A. 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i feel the same way it stinks. of course we all know the bottom line is profit. one way to beat that is when they do begin to change, labelling, sizes, prices etc. don't buy any other of their products and email them to tell them so and why you will find some will respond and you could get a couple of freebies. good luck
2007-10-27 19:28:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by jessica c 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Back in the 80's Dorito's came out with Sour Cream & Onion Dorito's and I loveddddddddddddd them.. Where are they today?? UGHHHHHHHHHHHH
2007-10-27 19:31:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tracey 2
·
1⤊
0⤋