English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://epw.senate.gov/public/_files/GoreAndAnnualHomeElectriciy.jpg

2007-10-27 18:46:58 · 13 answers · asked by qwert 7 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Gore has become the ultimate example of "do as I say, not as I do".

He has latched onto a fad and natural process to exploit the brainwashed masses into thinking of him as a messiah. While he profits from their stupidity he lives a life of excess.

Of course now we're going to read about how it's just a "right wing conspiracy" and about solar panels (the least efficient way to produce energy), or how the house is also an office (but not that the chart is only for ONE of his houses). Oh well, his drones are at least good for a laugh.

2007-10-27 18:56:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Gore is very well connected with oil companies.
E-85 gas only produces 75% of the oil emissions that regular gas does, but it burns 30% less efficiently (for those of you that don't get what I'm saying, you're actually polluting MORE by using these hybrid cars).
The world goes through these sorts of things. In the 1940s scientists were convinced that we were going to enter another ice age. The reasons stated were the exact same ones being stated for global warming today.
Most of the earth's overall temperatures are hardly affected by carbon emission, but by water (there was more carbon in the atmosphere before the Industrial Revolution than there is now).
Polar ice caps melting, blah blah blah, all that would take close to a 1000 years to actually happen. No way the warming would last that long.
Al Gore isn't using science and isn't even qualified to make a movie like that.
So yeah, the 'libs' are wrong when they say all that stuff about Global Warming.
But then again, the 'cons' are wrong when they say it's really all that bad to do what the 'libs' ask, because really it won't hurt and could actually help us out in the long run, who knows?
The point is that we're being lied to so the government and corporations can get more money.

2007-10-28 01:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by Jo'Dan 3 · 0 1

OK. I'll make an small allowance for him using it as an office. However, when I add in his condo in San Francisco, his other home in Tennessee and his home in Alexandria, VA, I'd say that his electrical usage across all four residences are substantially more than I use in my home. The man is a hypocrite. Al is also very fond of using private jets, even when there is an abundance of flights available on commercial aircraft. For that matter, so are other great environmentalists such as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Leonardo DiCaprio. Seems these people are also rather fond of large limousines, which get substantially worse gas mileage than my Ford Focus.

2007-10-28 02:12:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Here's something to think about... To all you Gore haters, AND Bush haters...
There is technology available TODAY, that can power YOUR car with water. It's called a hydrogen fuel cell.
They are simple to make with stuff you can get at walmart.
But thanks to the government taking BIG$$$ from oil companies, these hydrogen cells are illegal to manufacture and sell in the USA.
The technology IS available, if you don't believe me google "water powered cars". Personally I have made and operated one of these fuel cells.
If Al Gore is so "green", why doesn't he push this technology over anything else?
Think about it.

2007-10-28 02:14:24 · answer #4 · answered by Change... 1 · 0 0

No. There's two othe rthings you need to know:

1) that figure is based on a false report put out by a right -wing group. And the Tennesseepower company released his poer bills at his request to prove they were lying.

2) Al Gore's home is powered by solar power.

ROTFLMAO!

BTW: Either way it's irrelevant. You are attacking Gore--not his arguement on man-made global warming. That is a logical fallacy called the "ad hominum tu quoque" arguement. It means attempting to discredit an arguement by discrediting the person making the arguement. (specifically, in this caseby claiming his actions are inconsistant with the position he has taken) That does not work. The only way to discredit an arguement is to show it is invalid. WHO makes the arguement is irrelevant.

2007-10-28 01:56:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

No you could probably see something else for variety.
LMAO about Algores house running on Solar panels thatwould only take about a football stadiums worth. Last I heard Panels don't produce natural gas either

2007-10-28 02:12:27 · answer #6 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 0 1

Is that Al Gores attempt at "Better to Burn Out then to fade away."

2007-10-28 01:55:28 · answer #7 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 2 1

The Gore worshippers will probably tell you, that chart was released by the oil companies to discredit Gore, Their Messiah!

2007-10-28 01:51:02 · answer #8 · answered by Ninja Rabbit 007 4 · 8 2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! that's hilarious! He doesn't know ****, he just says what people tell him to say, and things that will give him attention, and make him popular.

To tell you the truth, he's to ugly, i find my eyes water whenever i look at him.

2007-10-28 03:02:04 · answer #9 · answered by Fishy!!! 5 · 0 0

Nice chart.

I guess, he's trying to use as much as he can before it all runs out.

2007-10-28 01:52:15 · answer #10 · answered by wider scope 7 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers