The 9/11 conspiracy theory and facts...?

Question

Dunno if you viewed the numerous videos on utube covering the subjects - They are well worth viewing if you have not (just type 9/11 in the search window and you'll see them).

Anyway, much of the info from the noted videos is very troubling... Watch them and see for yourself.

Answer 1

If the federal government had initiated a truly independent investigation, you wouldn't see that happening. I mean a commission of structural engineers, law enforcement, physicists, aviation authorities, and explosives experts. If you stack a commission with politicians and head it with someone from your own administration, it's pretty much tainted. They also also starved it of funding and time allowed. Who do so unless there is something to cover up?

Answer 2

Yes, I have seen them and they are disturbing. I think I would have given them less credence if Shrub and his cronies had not worked so hard to prevent the 9/11 commission from forming and getting information. I especially love that shrub refused to take an oath when testifying there. People really should view as much information as they can with an open mind.

Answer 3

i assume this became conspiracy theory to which i became referring once I wrote my answer on why some human beings have self assurance that nonsense. it quite is a manner of controlling the uncontrollable for them. It makes them sense somewhat extra secure in the event that they "truly understand what took place."

Answer 4

HMM lets see all of the bombers almost were Saudis....
King Fahd and George Bush had a reason to be allies.
Blame something on the Iraqi's....I wouldn't put it past them. I live in the town were they Saudi students went to school and a friend trained them and said they were so bad they couldn't figure out how to fly a Cessna let alone a Commercial Airline.

Answer 5

You Tube is hardly my source for facts. I know it's hip among the kids. If you are a true conspiracy theorist without any partisan agenda,then you ought to be looking into possible cover ups by the Clintons and any attacks during the 90's.

Answer 6

They are quite funny and quite offending and quite stupid. (Depending on which specific one you mean of course). And youtube, is not exactly a source for correct info. Entertainment, yes, facts on 9/11, no not really. And please don't pm any sites that say the same things like patriotsquestion9/11 and other completely biased and infounded websites.

Answer 7

i love my country but fear my government, however the aircraft brought down the towers. The buildings fell from the top down, not from the bottom down, however ill never believe the JFK fairytale.

Answer 8

The conspiracy theory were all presumptions with no evidence.

Answer 9

All those conspiracy websites are distortions and lies meant to sucker in gullible people.

Here are some typical false claims:

CLAIM: There were puffs of dust when the towers collapsed, so that means there were bombs
FACT: Actually, this happens all the time, so it means nothing.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4#puffs

CLAIM: No other skyscraper fell from fire alone
FACT: The towers fell mainly from the columns being knocked out by the planes, the fires only helped.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse" to hear NIST explain it.

CLAIM: WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn't hit by a jet
FACT: Seven large buildings were destroyed by the falling towers, so the collapse of WTC7 is not surprising.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks

CLAIM: No plane wreckage was found at the pentagon
FACT: Hundreds of rescue workers found wreckage & pictures of this abound
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)

CLAIM: Bush's brother was "head" of security at the WTC
FACT: His brother was on the Board of Directors & left before 9/11. The Board has nothing to do w/ day-to-day operations

CLAIM: The collapse at WTC looked like a “controlled demolition.”
FACT: Real, non-government demolition experts laugh at this. Here’s what they said in the leading demolition journal in the world:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

CLAIM: The towers fell at "free fall speeds"
FACT: NIST said they fell far slower than this
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm (point 6)

CLAIM: Firemen heard "explosions"
FACT: NIST reviewed over 500 fireman testimonies & found no evidence of bombs
See Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

CLAIM: Prof Jones says the collapse violates the "laws of physics"
FACT: The engineering dept at his own University, Brigham Young U, has denounced Jones calling him “disturbing”
http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm


CLAIM: Melted steel was found
FACT: NIST says “In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires.” See point 7a at
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

CLAIM: You can’t make cell phone calls from a plane.
FACT: It’s against regulations, but everyone knows you can make cell calls. The connection tends to cut off, but it can be done.

CLAIM: NORAD was blocked from shooting down the jets.
FACT: The controllers didn’t know what was going on, so they didn’t call NORAD until it was too late.

CLAIM: NIST said it can’t explain the collapse completely
FACT: NIST’s computer model showed that the towers collapsed from the impact & fire. NIST merely said it couldn’t calculate where the pieces of the Towers would fall once collapse started.
See Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

CLAIM: No wreckage was found at Shanksville, PA
FACT: Lots of wreckage was found; the largest piece was an engine fan.

-----------------------------------
By the way, independent engineers & scientists & demolition experts HAVE looked into the collapse & agree that it resulted from the impact & fires alone. For example (this list includes a Pentagon analysis):

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

Answer 10

I watched those too. my favorites are the alien theories. Very interesting.