If President Bush found a cure for cancer, would liberals complain that he didn't find it fast enough?

Answer 1

Yes, and then they'd begin a smear campaign that he hasn't cured AIDS yet.

Answer 2

This question is dumb. If Bush found a cure for cancer, it would over shadow is failed policies. He would be hailed as one of the greatest minds of our time, if not history. He would win the Nobel Peace Prize, amongst other scientific prizes. But this is highly unlikely. How could you expect a c average person to accomplish something the best minds in the world couldn't? He isn't a good leader, i don't see how he could be a great inventor. You should post reasons why you support Bush rather than bashing liberals. Its not like we don't have a reason for not supporting him. I don't support him for his policies, not because I hate him. I don't hate him. I don't even know him, but i do know he has been a bad leader. He isn't even a good conservative. He is the worst of both worlds. At least most conservatives are concerned about our defecit. He takes away basic rights, and he spends more money than we have. I never still havent figured out how he spends more money than any president ever, but he still manages to lower taxes. Crazy huh. Actually i know how. He just spends carelessy without any regard as to how we will pay for it, cause he knows someone else after him will be there to clean up the mess. He doesn't want to deal with any of our real problems, he just wants to push them off on someone else.

Answer 3

If President Bush found a cure for cancer, then I would know I was dreaming.

And what if Al Gore found a cure for cancer? Would the White House dismiss it out of hand?

Answer 4

No. But Congress would start investigations immediatly about why Bush and Haliburton created cancer. Thats why they build the black helicopters, to give cancer to the people and see how they react stealthy like.

The reason they need to sit in the helicopters for this is because all things red are no longer sending their transmissions to the secret bunkers anymore.

Answer 5

I am almost 100% sure there is a cure for cancer, and Bush knows about it, but it will never be released.

Answer 6

This question has nothing to do with anything. Bush is not an idiot because he's too slow, he's an idiot because he's made and continues to make a huge mess out of everything that he touches.

For this question to be relevant, Bush would have had to have done something good so far (so that people could complain he hadn't done it fast enough). He's done nothing positive, slowly or otherwise.

Answer 7

I doubt it would only be the liberals, everyone that hates Bush and blames everything wrong on him would do it. Then they would say that he held back the cure long enough to come in at the end and be a hero before he left office or something. It just has to do with bias and narrowmindedness I suppose.

Answer 8

Yes, and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would be the first ones on the White House steps in front of the cameras...
Didn't you know President Bush invented cancer, just like he causes hurricanes??

Answer 9

Of course they wouldn't. But the neo-cons would blame the liberals for the delay because they cost the president so much precious time defending his position on freedom (which, by the way has nothing to do with the war).

Answer 10

Why would Bush be researching cancer? Shouldn't he leave that to the scientists?

Answer 11

If President Bush were found to be a war criminal, would you support his being prosecuted at the Hague, or would you just continue to blame the world's woes on the Left?