English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://youtube.com/watch?v=AhK7vdDEMFY

2007-10-27 17:00:34 · 8 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

He's not a Republican so the Democrats have no incentive to condemn him since there is absolutely no political gain. Nancy publicly scolded him, but in private probably told him "keep up the good work." Her rebuke was hardly a condemnation.

2007-10-27 17:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

qwelzf Every country that has socialized medicine has proven it to be a failure, that's why people from Canada, England, and elsewhere come to the US to be treated. They can't wait 9 months to see a specialist. And one more thing please don't refer to it as free cause it's not. Also socialized med. would not give any benefit to med. companies for health inovation in this country. Those other western countries that have socialized med. piggyback on the USA for med. inovation and break through. Without us and our current system they'd be S.O.L..

2007-10-28 02:24:05 · answer #2 · answered by mfitz67 2 · 1 0

Bush is correct to veto it.
The Government will only corrupt it like it does everything else
it controls that should be in the private sector.

2007-10-28 00:08:31 · answer #3 · answered by messinger1965 3 · 5 3

Why is it that EVERY OTHER COUNTRY HAS IT AND ITS GOOOOOD!!!!!

Are we too corrupt and stupid?
Or do the insurance companies pay the politicians to vote the other way and brainwash idiots. Every other western country has free healthcare. And its fine. But we cant. Cuz If you can scare enough retards and make them think free healthcare = communism then it doesnt work.

Yeah, he shouldn't have said that bush likes our troops to die though. Thats kinda overstatement. I mean he....IS a Nazi but only by blood...as far as I know. I dont think he wants our troops to die though, cuz he needs them for the next war.

wow, some of you are superpsycho crazy. Chillin in the 30% I see.

2007-10-28 00:19:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

LOL! You're kidding me right? His first few statements crack me up when he says Republicans don't care about children's health, saying Republicans say they can't find the money for a child's health-care, but they have the money to fight in Iraq.
What I find so hysterical, is that Liberals think women have the RIGHT to murder their unborn babies in needless abortions, but Americans don't have the right to protect themselves from terrorism (Patriot Act), or support the Troops in Iraq who are fighting them! I find it ridiculous that they advocate the murder of babies who cannot fight for their lives, yet claim to be so worried for our Troops who can, and protect the American People!
It's HYPOCRISY at it's best!

How many babies will be left to give health-care to, after the "pro-choice" Liberals are through with their abortions??????

2007-10-28 00:13:54 · answer #5 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3 5

I hate the democrats, but to be fair, Pelosi did condemn his comments.

2007-10-28 00:03:21 · answer #6 · answered by C C 3 · 1 5

Pelosi said he should apologize, other than that, no.

Hey, they didn't stand up to a website, why would they stand up to a colleague.

2007-10-28 00:03:25 · answer #7 · answered by FRANKFUSS 6 · 4 3

you are def. not a fiscal conservative......

2007-10-28 00:05:35 · answer #8 · answered by The One 2 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers