In his latest column, called "Impeach George Bush?" Buckley spells out what Clinton was impeached for, without going into the personal context of the investigation.
He then goes on to dismiss meaningful and important charges against Bush in proposed articles of impeachment, as "everything this side of a parking ticket".
Those charges include waging an illegal war of agression, deliberately misleading Congress and the American people in reasons for waging war, breaking FISA law by spying on American citizens without getting easily obtainable warrants, breaking international treaties which, as such, are the law of the land in America, such as the Geneva Conventions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Buckley describes Nixon's impending impeachment, before he resigned, as "inevitable."
It is clear to anyone with eyes to see that the scale and magnitude of Bush's offenses make Nixon look like a boy scout in comparison.
2007-10-27
14:56:16
·
7 answers
·
asked by
dontknow772002
3
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
Furthermore Buckley suggests that anyone who thinks Bush deserves impeachment is some kind of unreasonable crackpot, residing somewhere out on the lunatic fringe.
Fact is, nearly twice as many people support Bush's impeachment now than people supported impeachment of Clinton back in 1998.
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/47/18164
2007-10-27
15:01:06 ·
update #1
Jerry, I appreciate your resentment, but conservatives and liberals alike are disenchanted, to say the least, and I think people need to come together at this point, Bush and Cheney are drumming up World War 3 now, by all appearances, drumming up a bombing campaign in Iran, using the same methods they used for the Iraq invasion, repetition in the media of their scare-mongering, and completely distorted talking points, etc.
Some of the most virulent Bush critics come from the true conservative mindset.
People like Paul Craig Roberts, for example, Ronald Reagan's former Assistant Secretary to the Treasury. Read any one of his columns here, and you 'll see what I mean:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts-arch.html
2007-10-27
15:10:02 ·
update #2
Steel Head: Oh? And do you see that the value of the U.S. dollar is now at par with Canada for the first time in 30 or 40 years? This is due to borrowing for the 2 trillion projected dollars for the Bush wars, mostly from Asian banks. This acts as a tax on Americans, who need more dollars to pay for goods, especially foreign goods, of which America is now more dependent on.
Do you see that the military is stretched very thin now, troops on their 4th or 5th tours of duty, National Guard over there, leaving less resources to deal with emergencies at home, where they should be?
Do you see that the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions have caused the opposite of what they were intended to do, causing only more anti-American sentiment worldwide?
Don't just take my word for it, Rumsfeld's Pentagon said so:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_120704V.shtml
2007-10-27
15:18:33 ·
update #3
Many people would disagree with you, some of whom have in fact done their research.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=bush+articles+of+impeachment&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&vc=&fp_ip=KR
Your 'legal argument' looks highly technical and evasive, if it is valid at all, and seems to miss the obvious. There is the letter of the law, and the spirit of the law, the latter would trump. Bush did in fact, knowingly lie, or deceive, when presenting certain 'evidence' against Saddam Hussein, and when addressing the warrantless spying against Americans. Overall, I think it can be successfully proven that Bush violated his constitutional oath, and that his crimes (Al Gore even came out and said Bush acted illegally in the warrantless spying, and I'll take his word over yours, sorry), and also that his actions have done great harm.
Only reason they aren't impeaching Bush is that they don't want Cheney to take his place, so they are working on a Cheney impeachment instead.
2007-10-28
11:54:00 ·
update #4
(above comment intended for 'Desertviper')
2007-10-28
11:55:03 ·
update #5