English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think parents must secrefice their desires for the future and better growth of their childrens.
Divorce must be the very, very & very last choice.
What do you think ?

2007-10-27 11:29:04 · 11 answers · asked by little girl 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

11 answers

I agree 100% with you. Nothing gets solved with divorce, but many things get solved with communication which is something many couples lack. That is why it is very important to communicate prior to marriage, as to who will pay what bills, how many kids you will have, what happens if you end up with more than the kids you planned, who is going to work, where will you live, things like that. That is just the beginning. As marriage goes on, communications should be key throughout the marriage. Once you have kids, your spouse still comes first, then your kids. Kids aren't happy, unless parents are happy and level headed.

2007-10-27 11:49:59 · answer #1 · answered by Pinolera 6 · 1 0

I have to disagree. What is the quality of everyone in the familys lives if you have unhappy parents? Yes, divorce should be the last choice, but I dont think the parents lives should be put in the "dumpster" for the sole purpose of the children. If that is the case, sometimes the parent feels a bit of resentment. Life does go on after divorce. Sometimes alot better than when all living under one roof. All situations are different.

2007-10-27 11:58:15 · answer #2 · answered by Peanut Butter 5 · 0 1

I don't believe divorce should ever be an option unless their is violence or infidelity involved. I believe if a couple had a strong enough bond to make the vows, their bond is strong enough to withstand the tests of time. But the parents must not forget about each other while focusing all their attention on the children, that's where the parents go wrong. Focus on one another. The children will thank you later!

2007-10-27 11:42:50 · answer #3 · answered by charamone 2 · 1 0

if a couple chooses to start a family by choice...YES.

therefore its the parents job to sacrifice their needs until the child is of age.

if a couple is not ready for a family, usually its because they want to accomplish something career wise, buy a home etc, before starting a family....and know that their lives will be put on hold for awhile.

but even if its the latter...any parent knows we have sacrified alot, and we dont complain about it either, for the life of our kids.

hope this helps

2007-10-27 12:08:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Divorce is the last item on the list , depending on the situation . As far as sacrificing for children that also is situational

2007-10-27 11:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by the only 1 hobo 5 · 1 0

You got to sacrefice your desire. As you already brought your kids into this world, they have no ability to raise themselves. It's your reponsibility naturely and leagally. That's also why parents' love is the greatest ans selfless.

2007-10-30 08:29:09 · answer #6 · answered by Mark P 1 · 0 0

I absolutely agree about this statement and that's Why they there its not just to go the easy road there is a bump as well that you can not avoid so you have to go over it .

2007-10-27 11:46:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Here's a twist on what you wrote, my ex husband sacrifice his own wants and needs for him self, and said the hell to his wife and daughter, now how wrong was that?? This is why he's the EX !!

2007-10-27 11:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by kim t 7 · 0 1

i think that the children should always come 1st.
I'd rather my kids be from a broken home than live in a broken family

2007-10-27 11:33:03 · answer #9 · answered by autumnbrookblue 4 · 2 1

Sometimes it is the only choice

2007-10-27 11:35:14 · answer #10 · answered by what did you say 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers