If not, why not?
2007-10-27 10:20:37 · 14 answers · asked by golfer7 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
So many tired, old answers. Yes, Armitage leaked to Novak. And Libby, Rove and Fleischer leaked to other reporters.
And Valerie Plame was, without any question, as confirmed by the current director of the DIA, COVERT at the time she was outed.
2007-10-27 10:31:07 · update #1
That was Director of the CIA, General Hayden.
2007-10-27 10:31:45 · update #2
Some of them obviously owe her more than just an apology. They have destroyed her career and who knows what else happened because of their attempts at destroying her husband's credibility.
Her status WAS covert.
2007-10-27 10:24:55 · answer #1 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Nope.
The Bush Administration is owed an apology by the phony hypocrite Valerie Plame.
(Secretaries that go in and out of the CIA Bldg everyday are Not Covert Agents.)
I had a Top Secret Security Clearance, and Plame is a phony.
It was just another Democrat Political "Hit".
2007-10-27 17:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Considering Fitzgerald did not go after Richard Armitage, that is who reviled her name. It was not Libby.
And before the name drop was out her and her husband were all over on different talk shows trying to bash GW.
So is she owed one??? No she is not. In addition during the congressional hearings she was lying more then a few times.
And we should be more worried about when the New York Times reviles secrets.
2007-10-27 17:41:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, she doesn't. Her husband owes her an apology for eitehr lying to congress or in his editorial for the New York Times. She owes the CIA an apology for recommending him then lying about it as well as having her picture taken for Vanity Fair. Richard Armitage should apologize or be charged with the leak, if she was covert. Where's that investigator now? But she doesn't deserve an apology from Bush. Her husband going Manhattan Cocktail Party ended her career.
2007-10-27 17:33:02 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Nope, she has consistently lied to the American public to advance and ideological agenda and to reap financial rewards. She was NOT covert and her name went to the press by a Clinton hold over, not a Bush appointee- FACTS.
Her and her husbands story about the Niger trip has been refuted by the US Senates select committee on intelligence among other sources.
Sorry but she is a liar and deserves no apology. Unfortunately people take talking points and opinion in substitute for reality and that is what is wrong with America
Interesting how people like you stray from the facts just because they dont fit the story you want to tell. The thumbs down by blind ideologues are a welcomed badge of honor. She was NOT covert and that has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt. Her Niger story has been refuted by the US Senate of all places whether you libs like it or not.
2007-10-27 17:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Of course she does but it will never happen.
The Bush administration lacks integrity.
2007-10-27 17:40:40 · answer #6 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Her life has been changed, forever. The bush administration owes her AT THE VERY LEAST, an apology.
2007-10-27 17:34:13 · answer #7 · answered by katydid 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
yes she does
but the reps LACK what it takes to admit to a wrongful action
the so-called moral majority is immoral
the so-called christian conservatives are UNchristian
the so-called right wing is wrong
2007-10-27 17:47:29 · answer #8 · answered by pəɹ noʎ uɐɥʇ ɹəʇɹɐɯs 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No because she was never a covert agent and the leak did not come from Scotter Libbey as we found out later it was Richard Armitage.
2007-10-27 17:24:28 · answer #9 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 7⤊ 5⤋
When John Bolton is offered the same from the Democrats.
2007-10-27 17:23:50 · answer #10 · answered by Kubla Con 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋