http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=489653&in_page_id=1965
i think this is an awesome theory! However the way we will turn out in one race is almost too perfect... you have to read this
2007-10-27
08:32:11
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Mooey
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
i know it wont happened in our life time but its stiil awesome!!
2007-10-27
08:38:49 ·
update #1
wow i dont believe it! its just a cool thought
2007-10-27
15:26:27 ·
update #2
i think it is cool!!
2007-10-27 08:36:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by .:Riku's homegirl:. 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why are you taking an obvious spoof/tabloid magazine as factual? Don't be a fool.
Edit:
I noticed that the article in on the Yahoo's main page. Why are they allowing such things to be put there. The placement to the simpleton *hint hint* is going to make some assume think that it is true. Add in information like a 'Doctor said' or " A top scientist said' and people just say 'well that means it must be true'.
The UK should be concerned with why grant money is being wasted on funding BS stuff like this.
2007-10-27 08:49:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures"
leaving aside jokes about jade goody and wayne rooney, he's been reading 'the time machine' by h.g. wells
~edit, okay reading down he even mentioned it, but he seems to have lifted the descriptions straight from the book.
i think it would be pretty horrible. that would give an 'ethically correct' scientific reason to mistreat and dehumanise other humans, people already do that enough anyway
also, with genetic alterations and manipulation being more common, i doubt that would ever happen, unless it was done purposefully.
2007-10-27 08:39:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It already did split once. We thought the Neanderthal man was human, but turned out he turned into a different species or never was human to begin with. Either way, only one would prevail. Survival of the fittest is always the rule on this planet anyway.
2007-10-27 08:40:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Irish 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Once again, science just explains God's creation. God created the Gentiles on the sixth day when He said, “Let us make man in our image” (Genesis 1:26). He did not create the Jews until after the seventh day, His day of rest. At some point after the seventh day, God created Adam, the father of the Jews.
Cain’s fear of being lynched, his marriage to an unknown woman and the fact that he founded a city (Genesis 4:14-17) are all interpreted as evidence that another race of men coexisted with Adam and his family.
Romans 5:12-14 “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.”
This passage is traditionally interpreted as meaning that death began with Adam’s sin and reigned unchecked among men (even among those who haven’t actually eaten the forbidden fruit, those who have sinned but not “in the likeness of the offense of Adam”) until the Law was given to Moses, the Pre-Adamic Gentiles sinned against God, but in a manner less egregious than Adam (which is why Adam’s sin brought death while there’s didn’t). They merely sinned against God’s moral will. Adam sinned against His Law. Adam disobeyed God’s prohibition by eating the forbidden fruit. He broke the Law of Paradise.The Pre-Adamic Gentiles were those who “had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam.”
Noah's flood? Glad you asked. Well, the entire earth was not flooded. Only what Noah KNEW, was flooded. If, all you KNEW were Atlanta, then you would say the entire world"Atlanta" was flooded.
2007-10-27 08:42:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by KingHenry ll 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
this is only if the theory of evolution is true. and secondly, we already are suffering from this type of thing, just not as severely or as exaggerated. it won't happen in my life time, so why should i give a damn....
2007-10-27 08:37:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
oh my holy rosery beads! that a heapen scary jeepy story you got there! gives me the quivery shiveries
2007-10-27 15:49:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rule #1-Don't believe everything you hear and read.
2007-10-27 10:20:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋