2007-10-27 07:10:17 · 7 answers · asked by dancing_queen0707 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mainly because nobody will, everyone's bailing out except the U.S.
2007-10-27 07:13:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The coalition? There are a total of 14,000 coalition troops in Iraq ( the UK and Korea will have pulled all of their troops out by the end of 2007 which will make the total around 10,000 coalition troops) compared to the 160,000 US troops. And of that 10,000 there are only about 1,000 actually in Baghdad so what exactly do you want the huge coalition force to do in Baghdad?
And a note, 18 countries have already withdrew all troops and equipment from Iraq. There is no coalition, never really was.
2007-10-27 07:24:31 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What coalition? They've all left. They will return in the form of contractors and consultants that will profit from the reconstruction of a free economy in Iraq that never existed before. France, Egypt, Jordan, Germany, Spain, Belgium, Saudi Arabia, the Netherlands, the UAE. They are all going to make a fortune on our backs as usual.
Did you know that Dutch troops in Afghanistan are not allowed by their government to engage in combat? Within ear-shot of Canadian troops being killed they did nothing.
Coalition my a s s. We are out their twisting in the wind all alone.
We have but one ally left. Australia, and the Australians hold Howard in contempt for his steadfast support of what we are trying to do so they will be turning their backs on us too soon.
2007-10-27 07:19:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
We do. The coalition helps us block financial networks, they help us track down criminals and investigate, they help us with troops on the ground, and they help us with the mere presence of an ally.
Don't be 2-dimensional about this. We're not fighting on the ground like terrorist gorillas who don't know any better. We're fighting a multi-dimensional war theater, and that's why we're winning so easily.
2007-10-27 07:14:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you are referring to other countries...
they are situated in other areas of Iraq, performing other security duties.
2007-10-27 07:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
share security????????????????? for the love of god!!! the u.s army should never have gone there in the first place, another mistake like vietnam and now they will have the world of trouble getting out of there with out casualties!! as for the sharing part!! why should other countries send their soldiers to iraq to be shot at and blown up because of a silly american miltary blunder. no they knew that it was a fools mission from out start!!
2007-10-27 07:18:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
why should they back up america in this illegal invasion of iraq,the US made the mess let them get themselves out of it..no doubt they will be looking for help when the crazy cowboy invades iran with our clown brown so far up his a**e you can just about see his shoe soles,,let them get on with thier quest for world domination for china and russia will
not sit back and watch this time...god help us the lunatics have taken over the asylum
2007-10-27 08:38:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋