For the oxygen problem, you can make oxygen a solid, it's just incredibly difficult because you have to get the temperature of the oxygen to 53.36 degrees Kelvin. I don't know of anything that could maintain that temperature, but you never know.
Theoretically, there is a particle that is faster than light. A tachyon is a theoretical particle that moves faster than light but cannot slow down to anything less than or equal to the speed of light. Since it's existance has yet to be proven, No, nothing is faster than light.
2007-10-27 06:50:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by stnicholas6496 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oxygen is solid below 54.36 K. Liquid nitrogen, at 77.36 K, is rather inexpensive, so solid oxygen shouldn't be much harder.
For all practical purposes, nothing is faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. It's hard to give a meaningful answer, other than that's the nature of spacetime.
2007-10-27 19:20:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hello.
I believe you already have your ansvver to the oxygen question, so I vvill not ansvver that.
As to your other question, "is there any thing or power or energy which is more faster than light?and why?" I have an ansvver.
Thought/consciousness is the fastest thing. VVhy? It's so fast it probably doesn't even travel, only it may seem to travel or has an illusion of traveling.
"[Alain] Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn't matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.
Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein's long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain away Aspect's findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations."
more at: http://www.crystalinks.com/holographic.html
Hope this ansvvers your question. Take care.
VVhen I investigate and when I discover that the forces of the heavens and the planets are within ourselves, then truly I seem to be living among the gods.
-Leon Battista Alberti
2007-10-27 09:00:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by WWJD: What Would Joker Do? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well Water is the only think that exists on earth in Solid, Liquid, & Gas, so by process of elmination I dont think that O2 can to turned into a solid, I know there is Liquid Oxygen and Oxygen (Wow who would have guess! :p) soooo Maybe it could be considered a semi-solid, like you could put so much pressure and heat onto it that it would have no choice but compress, just thoughts from me though
2007-10-27 06:45:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by shacka t 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
If left remoted, i.e. no different human interplay than between themselves they could have various questions approximately the place they are, why they are, the place lightning comes from and so on. Assuming you may secretly furnish them with their undemanding desires (nutrition, drink and so) they could in all probability come to a polytheistic view, a god that can provide nutrition, a god that makes it rain. faster or later they could be confronted with mortality, the two by utilising accident, illness or illness and that they could question whether or not there is a few thing greater. this could of path be a fascinating test, which notwithstanding basically proves that guy is calling for solutions and failing to get them on an psychological point, will characteristic this to "invisible" powers that may't be motivated.
2016-09-27 23:52:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another way to turn oxygen into a solid is with compression. That is the way we liquefy it, and compressing it further will solidify it. That is also the way we make "dry ice" from carbon dioxide gas.
2007-10-27 07:21:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by ayerbourn 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
you can turn oxygen into a solid, be colling it even more, but it not worthwhiel for any application so it is not done,
2007-10-27 06:46:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lilu 3
·
0⤊
1⤋