2007-10-27 05:32:40 · 20 answers · asked by Whitest_American 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, in fact, most Islamic countries we are picking fights with posed no threats to us until we start demanding things. America is just a petroleum hungry monster.
2007-10-27 05:36:47 · answer #1 · answered by Michael 2 · 5⤊ 10⤋
"Bush Neocons" can't change the constitution. Only congress can do that. Congress is currently controlled by democrats not "Neocons". Your question is based on false assumptions like so many liberal questions are. Its like Reagan said (I forget where he got it from) The problem isn't that you liberals know so little its that you know so much that isn't so. Pull your head out before its too late if it isn't already.
2007-10-27 13:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by rick b 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Muslims burning things,destroying things,killing people etc. is just a normal everyday thing,they've been doing that for over 1000 years.
And since Bush isn't "changing the US Constitution for Exxon" that isn't even an issue.
AD
2007-10-27 12:40:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
No, to Rick N, my favorite quote this week--
"only the paranoid survive"
Quite rightly 70% of the American people do not trust G.W. Bush, he has lied before and he continues to lie, we fear for our nation and our Constitutional freedoms.
2007-10-27 12:49:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You make it seem as if the President can make amendments to the Constitution on a whim.
2007-10-27 13:01:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mike W 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Muslims burning US flags are real. Liberals stating stupid questions of propaganda is annoying though not a real threat. If they continue their hold over our educational system through the teacher's unions they may be able to dumb down society enough where their rants become believed and a problem though I hope this never hits a tipping point.
2007-10-27 12:39:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 4⤋
Neocons put in practice harmful policies. Burning flags although offensive to some, are symbolic actions with much less impact on the body politic.
2007-10-27 12:44:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Charley Rangel (democrat) just offered to cut the taxes of Exxon from 35% to 30.5%.
What the heck are you talking about?
2007-10-27 12:36:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 2⤋
Somebody please explain how Bush and Neocons are related.
Honestly do any of you people throwing the word "neocon" around actually know what it means????
2007-10-27 12:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
To answer your "question", yes, they are more of a threat.
No, to the substance of it.
changing the US Constitution for Exxon?
Let's see your proof of this one Skippy
2007-10-27 12:50:01 · answer #10 · answered by Mark A 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Oh yeah, the Exxon amendment. I forgot to vote on that one.
2007-10-27 12:43:49 · answer #11 · answered by Charles C 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋