with oil, chinas labor, rip off tax payers money
2007-10-27 05:31:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I understand why America invaded Iraq, but not why England did. There are conflicting views on whether or not it was right, personally I feel that Saddam had it coming but they did it in the worst way possible - they destroyed the infrastructure, making the Iraqi's poorer. This gave radicals more power as they could say that America was occupying and destroying their country. A simple assassination and a few words in my opinion would have been enough. Right thing but in the wrong way. I have never blamed the French and Germans on not getting involved. Don't know who it will hurt the most though.
2007-10-27 12:38:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by It is His will. 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, based on the information that we had at the time and the fact that we should have taken out Saddam in 1991 and did the diplomatic thing and it cost us. The war did not cost much at all since the Iraqi Army folded up like a cheap tent, the cost has been standing around waiting for Iraqis to stand up for themselves in the face of inredible terror on average citizens. Yep, it has cost a lot of money and a lot of lives but we do what we have to do and we will pay for it somehow. Listen up Achmed, don't count on the left wing to sell your program for you as they are even smaller than the right wing in American politics. The average American is a moderate, hard working person who serves and helps when he can. You may think by reading things here that Americans are divided because there are people who prefer that and hope that they can divide us. The fact is that Bush got re elected during the war because millions of people from the DEm Party voted for him. Actually twice. So go back about your business of blowing up women and children in the market and we will do what we have to do to give those people a chance to live and have some control over their own lives.
2007-10-27 12:36:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tom W 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The conflict announced by Osama bin Laden and seconded by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is not avoidable. I can't say now which courses of action would have been best at his early date; but the war is far from over. And we didn't start it.
2.4 trillion dollars will not be the worst of what we will have to pay during the next 20 years. There will be a lot of destruction on both sides. We will need to do without a lot of the things we now consider necessities.
Once peace returns, though, prosperity will explode, and the deficits will disappear. It will be a new beginning. Even if the Islamists win, they will not be able to stop the resurgence of the human spirit entirely.
2007-10-27 12:36:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The entire coverage of the latest $199 billion war funding request has been nil.
Right now all the media can and should rightly cover is the horrific plight of multi-mullionaires who's mercedes and porches got melted next to their over-insured "winter homes" in San Diego.
It really has been heart wrenching to see these terribly afflicted folks. They deserve our full and undivided attention, and the response of the brilliant heroes to these needy folks in their darkest hour has been making us weepy, but PROUD to be Americans. God bless the United States of America!! God Bless our communities!
Other trifling matters like your whiny-anti-war rhetoric can wait. Real, beautiful Americans are being affected by the TRAGEDY in the hills around San Diego. Any attempt to focus on anything else is a distraction, and the most obvious form of leftist propaganda. The only thing that could POSSIBLY take precedent, in this hour of deepest peril, would be some miners trapped underground.
This is IRONY - for the idiots who cant tell.
2007-10-27 13:43:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by sloppyjoe25s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will hold a raffle that gives the winning ticket the first shot when bin Laden is executed. With 300 million people in America, I think at least half would pay a thousand bucks for that. There's a start.
After that, we sell pay per view to people who wanna watch the waterboarding at Guantanamo Bay. Ought to pay it off and then have enough money to send every liberal to France to boot.
To get even more money, we can hold an "Adopt a Bomb" campaign. For 100 bucks you get a plaque with your name on it attached to a 250 pound general purpose bomb. 500 bucks gets your name on a 2000 pound laser guided bomb, with a copy of the video as it goes in a Mosque window where there are terrorists hiding behind the walls and shooting our troops to boot.
Beyond that, we could just have all the liberals sell blood plasma and turn the proceedsover to the treasury. I think a gallon of plasma from every liberal would be fair. Then we can send their bodies to China and have them harvest the organs....split the proceeds 50/50 with the Commies.
2007-10-28 02:05:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Doug 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately the USA will be going bankrupt over this war.
Look what happened in the late 70's when the USA finally started paying for the Viet Nam conflict. Inflation went sky high and the economy went the other way. The uneducated republicans like to blame it all on President Cater, but in reality, he just inherited the bills of Viet Nam.
This time the bills will be astronomically bigger.
2007-10-27 12:39:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Herr Raging Boehner. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
how they going to pay this The Outstanding Public Debt as of 27 Oct 2007 at 04:43:38 PM GMT is:
$9,062,753,443,715.02
The estimated population of the United States is 303,369,865
so each citizen's share of this debt is $29,873.61.
check the debt at http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
2007-10-27 12:46:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jaime G 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm hoping more of the World will get involved in solving this problem.
If they don't get it now, -they'll get it in the future.
Eliminating these Extremist Freaks is a benefit for the entire World.
Where ever those Freaks might be . . . Iraq, South Florida, Iran . . . where ever.
2007-10-27 13:42:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by mark623112 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is the American middle class people that are going to pay and the corporations are going to benefit.
2007-10-27 12:32:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋